These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5659510)
1. Effects of the type of stimulus employed and the level of subject awareness on the detection of deception. Thackray RI; Orne MT J Appl Psychol; 1968 Jun; 52(3):234-239. PubMed ID: 5659510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of deception as a function of galvanic skin response recording methodology. Moroney WF; Zenhausern RJ J Psychol; 1972 Mar; 80(2d Half):255-62. PubMed ID: 5059820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Socialization, awareness, and the electrodermal response to deception and self-disclosure. Waid WM; Orne MT; Wilson SK J Abnorm Psychol; 1979 Dec; 88(6):663-6. PubMed ID: 512193 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Truth and deception: a reply to Lykken. Raskin DC; Podlesny JA Psychol Bull; 1979 Jan; 86(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 377355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An experimental comparison of the psychological stress evaluator and the galvanic skin response in detection of deception. Horvath F J Appl Psychol; 1978 Jun; 63(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 690061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of level of socialization on electrodermal detection of deception. Waid WM; Orne MT; Wilson SK Psychophysiology; 1979 Jan; 16(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 758621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The comparison question polygraph test: a contrast of methods and scoring. Honts CR; Reavy R Physiol Behav; 2015 May; 143():15-26. PubMed ID: 25703188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of verbal responses on the laboratory detection of deception. Gustafson LA; Orne MT Psychophysiology; 1965 Jul; 2(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 5830488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Individual differences in electrodermal lability and the detection of information and deception. Waid WM; Orne MT J Appl Psychol; 1980 Feb; 65(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 7364702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Group GSR technique in the detection of deception. Orne MT; Thackray RI Percept Mot Skills; 1967 Dec; 25(3):809-16. PubMed ID: 6083301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of incomplete information on the detection of concealed crime details. Elaad E Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2011 Sep; 36(3):159-71. PubMed ID: 21431422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of deception: consistency in responding and personality. Gudjonsson GH; Haward LR Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Jun; 54(3 Pt 2):1189-90. PubMed ID: 7110860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A psychophysiological study of determinants for detection of deception. Yamaoka K Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1976 Mar; 23(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 1065507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Effect of visual feedback and application of skin potential response to detection of deception]. Suzuki S; Watanabe T; Shimizu K Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1969 Jun; 40(2):59-67. PubMed ID: 5818018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]