These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5660650)

  • 21. A comparison of auditory and visual apparent motion presented individually and with crossmodal moving distractors.
    Strybel TZ; Vatakis A
    Perception; 2004; 33(9):1033-48. PubMed ID: 15560506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Temporal numerosity discrimination: intermodal comparisons revisited.
    Lechelt EC
    Br J Psychol; 1975 Feb; 66(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 1131477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A motion aftereffect from visual imagery of motion.
    Winawer J; Huk AC; Boroditsky L
    Cognition; 2010 Feb; 114(2):276-84. PubMed ID: 19853246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Modulation of the motion aftereffect by selective attention.
    Chaudhuri A
    Nature; 1990 Mar; 344(6261):60-2. PubMed ID: 2304555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Auditory codability and the short-term retention of visual information.
    Nickerson RS
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Oct; 95(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 5071917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [MOTION AFTEREFFECT AS A UNIVERSAL PHENOMENON IN SENSORY SYSTEMS INVOLVED IN SPACE ORIENTATION. II. AUDITORY MOTION AFTEREFFECT].
    Andreeva IG
    Zh Evol Biokhim Fiziol; 2015; 51(3):145-53. PubMed ID: 26281216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. First-order and second-order visual processes in the perception of motion and tilt.
    Mather G
    Vision Res; 1991; 31(1):161-7. PubMed ID: 2006549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Criterion shift rule and perceptual homeostasis.
    Warren RM
    Psychol Rev; 1985 Oct; 92(4):574-84. PubMed ID: 3903816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Motion fading and the motion aftereffect share a common process of neural adaptation.
    Hsieh PJ; Tse PU
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):724-33. PubMed ID: 19429955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. PSYCHOLOGICAL CORRELATES OF ABNORMAL ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC PATTERNS IN FAMILIAL RETARDATES.
    BUTLER AJ; CONRAD WG
    J Clin Psychol; 1964 Jul; 20():338-43. PubMed ID: 14177645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Chronic users of LSD: the "acidheads".
    Blacker KH; Jones RT; Stone GC; Pfefferbaum D
    Am J Psychiatry; 1968 Sep; 125(3):97-107. PubMed ID: 5667213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Auditory feedback in the control of congenital nystagmus.
    Kirschen DG
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1983 May; 60(5):364-8. PubMed ID: 6881263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Change of temporal-order judgment of sounds during long-lasting exposure to large-field visual motion.
    Teramoto W; Watanabe H; Umemura H
    Perception; 2008; 37(11):1649-66. PubMed ID: 19189730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Two definitions of persistence in visual perception.
    Hawkins HL; Shulman GL
    Percept Psychophys; 1979 Apr; 25(4):348-50. PubMed ID: 461095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Face aftereffects predict individual differences in face recognition ability.
    Dennett HW; McKone E; Edwards M; Susilo T
    Psychol Sci; 2012; 23(11):1279-87. PubMed ID: 23073026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Extraversion and the visual figural after-effect with tachistoscopic presentation.
    Byth W
    Br J Psychol; 1972 Nov; 63(4):569-71. PubMed ID: 4661084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attention and processing capacity in auditory recognition.
    Moore JJ; Massaro DW
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Jun; 99(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 4714081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Crossmodal interactions and multisensory integration in the perception of audio-visual motion -- a free-field study.
    Schmiedchen K; Freigang C; Nitsche I; Rübsamen R
    Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 1466():99-111. PubMed ID: 22617375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Transformation stroboscopic movement as a method for measurement of the functional properties of "fragments" and "parts" in figural perception].
    Trombini G; Stadler M; Stegagno L
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1970 Sep; 46(18):749-52. PubMed ID: 5502069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Failure to update the egocentric representation of the visual space through labyrinthine signal.
    Blouin J; Gauthier GM; Vercher JL
    Brain Cogn; 1995 Oct; 29(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 8845120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.