These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5663588)

  • 1. Nonreinforced responding as a function of the direction of a prior ordered incentive shift. II. A replication with fixed-interval reinforcement schedule.
    Marx MH
    J Exp Psychol; 1968 May; 77(1):159-60. PubMed ID: 5663588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adrenal responses to reinforcement and extinction: role of expectancy versus instrumental responding.
    Coe CL; Stanton ME; Levine S
    Behav Neurosci; 1983 Aug; 97(4):654-7. PubMed ID: 6615640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resistance to extinction as a function of incentive, percentage of reinforcement, and number of nonreinforced trials.
    Uhl CN; Young AG
    J Exp Psychol; 1967 Apr; 73(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 6034010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PERSISTENCE OF NONREINFORCED RESPONDING AS A FUNCTION OF THE DIRECTION OF A PRIOR-ORDERED INCENTIVE SHIFT.
    MARX MH; TOMBAUGH JW; COLE C; DOUGHERTY D
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Dec; 66():542-6. PubMed ID: 14087629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characteristics and response-displacement effects of shock-generated responding during negative reinforcement procedures: pre-shock responding and post-shock aggressive responding.
    Hake DF; Campbell RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 May; 17(3):303-23. PubMed ID: 4624511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tests of behavior momentum in simple and multiple schedules with rats and pigeons.
    Cohen SL; Riley DS; Weigle PA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Sep; 60(2):255-91. PubMed ID: 8409822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of a single free food presentation on extinction responding in a multiple schedule.
    Reiss AJ; Bell MC
    Behav Processes; 2016 Sep; 130():46-52. PubMed ID: 27423967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of relative and absolute reinforcement magnitude on operant responding.
    Campbell AB; Seiden LS
    Physiol Behav; 1974 May; 12(5):843-9. PubMed ID: 4837423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extinction performance as a function of N-R transitions and intertrial reinforcement with extended partial reinforcement training.
    Spivey JE; Hess DT; Klemic J
    Psychol Rep; 1968 Jun; 22(3):765-71. PubMed ID: 5653367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement the outcome of an increase in overall activity or in operant responding?
    Weatherly JN; Arthur EI; Nurnberger JT
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Jan; 133(1):97-111. PubMed ID: 16475671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Instrumental performance following a shift in primary motivation depends on incentive learning.
    Balleine B
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Jul; 18(3):236-50. PubMed ID: 1619392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differentially conditioned suppression as a function of shock intensity and incentive.
    Ayres JJ
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1968 Aug; 66(1):208-10. PubMed ID: 5672630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Licking behavior of rats in relation to saccharin concentration and shifts in fixed-ratio reinforcement.
    Hulse SH
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1967 Dec; 64(3):478-84. PubMed ID: 6082880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No impact of repeated extinction exposures on operant responding maintained by different reinforcer rates.
    Bai JYH; Podlesnik CA
    Behav Processes; 2017 May; 138():29-33. PubMed ID: 28216120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modification of reinforcement aftereffects and level of training.
    Spivey JE; Hess DT; Aponte JF
    Psychol Rep; 1968 Feb; 22(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 5641242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Involvement of the basolateral complex and central nucleus of amygdala in the omission effects of different magnitudes of reinforcement.
    Judice-Daher DM; Tavares TF; Bueno JL
    Behav Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 233(1):149-56. PubMed ID: 22569572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Low-response-rate conditioning history and fixed-interval responding in rats.
    LeFrancois JR; Metzger B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 May; 59(3):543-9. PubMed ID: 8315369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extinction of a runway response following noncontingent partial reinforcement and nonreinforcement in the goal box.
    Fitzgerald RD; Teyler TJ
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1968 Jun; 65(3):542-4. PubMed ID: 5667402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of absolute amount, mean amount, and pattern of reinforcement on acquisition and extinction.
    Jernstedt GC
    J Exp Psychol; 1968 Jul; 77(3):407-14. PubMed ID: 5665572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Within-subject testing of the signaled-reinforcement effect on operant responding as measured by response rate and resistance to change.
    Reed P; Doughty AH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jan; 83(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 15762379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.