These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5663597)

  • 1. Instrumental conditioning of the GSR: serendipitous escape and punishment training.
    Kimmel E; Kimmel HD
    J Exp Psychol; 1968 May; 77(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 5663597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Positive reinforcement and suppression of spontaneous GSR activity.
    May JR; Johnson HJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1969 Apr; 80(1):193-5. PubMed ID: 5787415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Instrumental conditioning of the GSR through the positive and the negative reinforcer (author's transl)].
    Suzuki N; Okaichi H
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1974 Jun; 45(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 4474531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Operant conditioning of the GSR using partial reinforcement.
    Greene WA
    Psychol Rep; 1966 Oct; 19(2):571-8. PubMed ID: 5912822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Suppression of GSR activity through operant reinforcement.
    Johnson HJ; Schwartzge
    J Exp Psychol; 1967 Nov; 75(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 6079844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of operant reinforcement on the GSR.
    MANDLER G; PREVEN DW; KUHLMAN CK
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1962 Jul; 5(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 14469217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Instrumental conditioning of the GSR: a comparison of light deprivation and monotony hypotheses.
    Coffman M; Kimmel HD
    J Exp Psychol; 1971 Aug; 89(2):410-3. PubMed ID: 5567145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Operant suppression of electrodermal response rate as a function of punishment schedule.
    Crider A; Schwartz GE; Shapiro D
    J Exp Psychol; 1970 Feb; 83(2):333-4. PubMed ID: 5480906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attempted maintenance of the classically conditioned GSR via response-contingent termination of the CS: negative results.
    Kimmel HD; Lucas ME
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Feb; 97(2):278-80. PubMed ID: 4705239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ABOLITION OF THE PRE BY INSTRUCTIONS IN GSR CONDITIONING.
    BRIDGER WH; MANDEL IJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 May; 69():476-82. PubMed ID: 14285602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. GSR conditioning and pseudoconditioning with prolonged practice.
    Morrow MC; Seiffert PD; Kramer LL
    Psychol Rep; 1970 Aug; 27(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 5454119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Elimination of behavior of mental patients by response-produced extinction.
    HOLZ WC; AZRIN NH; AYLLON T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1963 Jul; 6(3):407-12. PubMed ID: 13961498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Operant behavior and the galvanic skin potential under DRL schedule.
    Meurice E; Weiner H; Sloboda W
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1966 Mar; 9(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 5907823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stimulus control over operant galvanic skin responses.
    Defran RH; Badia P; Lewis P
    Psychophysiology; 1969 Jul; 6(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 5820900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of positive and negative force-contingent reinforcement on the frustration effect in humans.
    Ditkoff G; Ley R
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 May; 102(5):818-23. PubMed ID: 4847737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resistance to punishment and subsequent extinction of a response as a function of its reward history.
    Vogel-Sprott M; Thurston E
    Psychol Rep; 1968 Apr; 22(2):631-7. PubMed ID: 5650263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of differential afferent feedback on instrumental GSR conditioning.
    Edelman RI
    J Psychol; 1970 Jan; 74(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 5409636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Instrumental electrodermal conditioning in the monkey (Cebus albifrons): acquisition and long-term retention.
    Kimmel HD; Brennan AF; McLeod DC; Raich MS; Schonfeld LI
    Anim Learn Behav; 1979 Nov; 7(4):447-51. PubMed ID: 120257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response contingency and effects of punishment: changes in autonomic and skeletal responses.
    Williams JL
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1969 May; 68(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 5793860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resistance to extinction in GSR conditioning following different numbers of postpeak acquisition trials.
    Schramm CF; Kimmel HD
    J Exp Psychol; 1970 May; 84(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 5480923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.