These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5667305)

  • 1. Clinical studies of induction agents. XVXVI. The relative potencies of thiopentone, methohexitone and propanidid.
    Clarke RS; Dundee JW; Barron DW; McArdle L
    Br J Anaesth; 1968 Aug; 40(8):593-601. PubMed ID: 5667305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anaesthesia and measurement.
    Conway CM
    Proc R Soc Med; 1974 Nov; 67(11):1087-91. PubMed ID: 4280073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relative potencies of methohexitone and thiopentone. A statistical study in man.
    Thomas ET
    Anaesthesia; 1967 Jan; 22(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 6016181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical studies of induction agents. XLIII: recovery from althesin--a comparative study with thiopentone and methohexitone.
    Carson IW; Graham J; Dundee JW
    Br J Anaesth; 1975 Mar; 47(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 1138743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative merits of intravenous anesthetic agents for outpatient surgery.
    Clarke RS
    Int Anesthesiol Clin; 1982; 20(1):51-69. PubMed ID: 6978852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical studies on induction agents. 28. A further comparison of venous complications following thiopentone, methohexitone and propanidid.
    O'Donnell JF; Hewitt JC; Dundee JW
    Br J Anaesth; 1969 Aug; 41(8):681-3. PubMed ID: 4897470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methohexitone and thiopentone. Response to stimuli and incidence of some side effects.
    Barry CT; Guy J; Goat V; Buchan AS
    Br J Anaesth; 1971 Oct; 43(10):963-72. PubMed ID: 5115033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical studies of induction agents. XIV: A comparative study of venous complications following thiopentone, methohexitone and propanidid.
    Hewitt JC; Hamilton RC; O'Donnell JF; Dundee JW
    Br J Anaesth; 1966 Feb; 38(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 4952449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anesthesia with alfentanil and methohexitone for short gynecological surgery. A comparison with thiopentone/nitrous oxide.
    Bernstein K; Wirpszo R; Djärv L
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1989 Aug; 33(6):458-62. PubMed ID: 2800986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of speed of injection on the potency of anaesthetic induction agents.
    Aveling W; Bradshaw AD; Crankshaw DP
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 1978 May; 6(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 352192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ED50 values for thiopentone, methohexital propanidid and Alfathesin: a clinical experiment.
    Crankshaw DP; Allt-Graham J
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 1978 Feb; 6(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 665975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anaesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy.
    McCleave DJ; Blakemore WB
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 1975 Aug; 3(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 1166948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Arterial blood gas analyses following administration of three short-acting i.v. hypnotics (propanidid, etomidate, methohexitone) (author's transl)].
    Doenicke A; Wagner E; Beetz KH
    Anaesthesist; 1973 Aug; 22(8):353-6. PubMed ID: 4584132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical studies of induction agents. XV. A comparison of the cumulative effects of thiopentone, methohexitone and propidid.
    Clarke RS; Dundee JW
    Br J Anaesth; 1966 May; 38(5):401-5. PubMed ID: 5939138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recovery after methohexitone and thiopentone.
    Barry CT; Lawson R; Davidson DG
    Anaesthesia; 1967 Apr; 22(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 6022277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Anesthesia and electrotherapy].
    Menzel H; Frey R
    Anaesthesist; 1970 Nov; 19(11):424-6. PubMed ID: 5315640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Potency changes of intravenous induction agents in the first ten weeks of life: an experiment using beagle dogs.
    Allt-Graham J; Pegg MS
    Vet Res Commun; 1983 Dec; 7(1-4):353-7. PubMed ID: 6665994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Studies with a methohexitone-propanidid mixture.
    Lyons SM; Hewitt JC; Elliott J; Barron DW; Nicholl RM
    Br Dent J; 1967 Dec; 123(11):526-8. PubMed ID: 4863116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of thiopentone and methohexitone as induction agents for Caesarean section.
    Morgan M; Holdcroft A; Whitwam JG
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 1980 Nov; 8(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 7457812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of sodium thiopental and methohexital for high-dose barbiturate anesthesia.
    Boarini DJ; Kassell NF; Coester HC
    J Neurosurg; 1984 Mar; 60(3):602-8. PubMed ID: 6699705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.