These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5675695)

  • 1. Semantic differential ratings of polygons varying in complexity-simplicity and symmetry-asymmetry.
    Eisenman R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1968 Jun; 26(3):Suppl:1243-8. PubMed ID: 5675695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Self-ratings of creativity, semantic differential ratings, and preferences for polygons varying in complexity, simplicity, and symmetry.
    Eisenman R; Grove MS
    J Psychol; 1972 May; 81(1st Half):63-7. PubMed ID: 4554293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preferences for complexity-simplicity and symmetry-asymmetry.
    Eisenman R; Gellens HK
    Percept Mot Skills; 1968 Jun; 26(3):888-90. PubMed ID: 5657743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of skewed symmetry.
    Sawada T; Pizlo Z
    J Vis; 2008 May; 8(5):14.1-18. PubMed ID: 18842085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Birth order and sex differences in complexity-simplicity, color-form preference and personality.
    Taylor RE; Eisenman R
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1968 Aug; 32(4):383-7. PubMed ID: 5673730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ratings of life and death and suicide intent.
    Wetzel RD
    Psychol Rep; 1975 Dec; 37(3 Pt 1):879-85. PubMed ID: 1197563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Affective and denotative structures of personality ratings.
    Kuusinen J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1969 Jul; 12(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 5803828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Complexity-simplicity: random vs non-random arrangement of shapes.
    Eisenman R; Jones D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1968 Jun; 26(3):682. PubMed ID: 5657705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mapping the semantic homunculus: a functional and behavioural analysis of overt semantic generation.
    Esopenko C; Borowsky R; Cummine J; Sarty G
    Brain Topogr; 2008 Sep; 21(1):22-35. PubMed ID: 18338245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The usefulness of the semantic differential with "mild grade' mental defectives.
    Dow MG; Ledwith F; Fraser WI; Bhagat M
    Br J Psychiatry; 1975 Oct; 127():386-92. PubMed ID: 1182390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of extreme exposure frequencies on different affective ratings of stimuli.
    Zajonc RB; Crandall R; Kail RV
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Apr; 38(2):667-78. PubMed ID: 4824108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual detection of symmetry of 3D shapes.
    Sawada T
    J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):4. PubMed ID: 20884553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The California Psychological Inventory and the Semantic Differential dimensions.
    Burger GK; Pickett L
    J Gen Psychol; 1976 Jan; 94(1st Half):129-34. PubMed ID: 943470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complexity-simplicity, experience, and ratings of a textbook.
    Eisenman R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1969 Dec; 29(3):958. PubMed ID: 5365105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The color-word connotative incongruity effect.
    Ridley DR; Johnson DE; Braisted PD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Jun; 46(3 Pt 1):939-46. PubMed ID: 673653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subjective and objective symmetry in perception of form.
    Plug C
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Jun; 44(3 Pt 1):727-35. PubMed ID: 876781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blacky the cat, I: semantic differential ratings.
    Schaeffer DL
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1968 Dec; 32(6):542-9. PubMed ID: 4881367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Self-ratings on the semantic differential: content versus response set.
    Long BH; Henderson EH; Ziller RC
    Child Dev; 1968 Jun; 39(2):647-56. PubMed ID: 5649971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The prediction of semantic differential ratings of color combinations.
    Hogg J
    J Gen Psychol; 1969 Jan; 80(1st Half):141-52. PubMed ID: 5779626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. FACTOR-STRUCTURE OF SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSES TO VISUAL FORMS AND PREDICTION OF FACTOR-SCORES FROM STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STIMULUS-SHAPES.
    ELLIOTT LL; TANNENBAUM PH
    Am J Psychol; 1963 Dec; 76():589-97. PubMed ID: 14082656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.