These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5676856)
1. Selective factors operating in the adjudication of incompetency. Haney CA; Michielutte R J Health Soc Behav; 1968 Sep; 9(3):233-42. PubMed ID: 5676856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Evaluation of Psychiatric Disability. Gold LH; Anfang SA; Drukteinis AM; Metzner JL; Price M; Wall BW; Wylonis L; Zonana HV J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4 Suppl):S3-S50. PubMed ID: 19092058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [On the problem of limited (diminished) imputability]. Semenov SF Zh Nevropatol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova; 1966; 66(8):1268-72. PubMed ID: 5991999 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Problems in legislation on the therapy and observation of mentally disordered offenders]. Nakajima T Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2003; 105(12):1427-30. PubMed ID: 15027306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. AAPL guideline for forensic evaluation of psychiatric disabilities: a disability law perspective. Weber MC J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):558-62. PubMed ID: 19092076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Commentary on Misconceptions and misuse of the MMPI-2 in assessing personal injury claimants. Lees-Haley PR NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(4):301-2. PubMed ID: 11876154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Is there discrimination against the mentally ill in the evaluation of disability?]. Perris C Lakartidningen; 1968 May; 65(22):2291-8. PubMed ID: 5725036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Criminal confinement and psychiatric impairment. Nussbaum K; Shaffer JW; Leihy RE Johns Hopkins Med J; 1971 Sep; 129(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 5113221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The psychiatrist's role in personal injury adjudication. Simon JL Dis Nerv Syst; 1970 May; 31(5):329-32. PubMed ID: 5426957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reassessing the aftercare treatment of individuals found not guilty due to a mental disability in Hunan, China: supplemental study into the disposition of mentally ill offenders after forensic psychiatric assessment. Wang X; Zhang D; Jiang S; Bai Y; Cucolo HE; Perlin ML Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2007 Apr; 41(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 17464720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Disabled doctors: the insurance industry seeks a second opinion. Wall BW; Appelbaum KL J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 9554705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The origins of forensic psychiatry in the United States and the great nineteenth-century crisis over the adjudication of wills. Mohr JC J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 9323654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The interaction of petitioner and deviant social characteristics in the adjudication of incompetency. Haney CA; Miller KS; Michielutte R Sociometry; 1969 Jun; 32(2):182-93. PubMed ID: 5796050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Severe mental disorder--difficult forensic psychiatric evaluation. Differences between Swedes and immigrants and between women and men analyzed]. Sturup J; Kristiansson M Lakartidningen; 2007 May 30-Jun 3; 104(22):1702-6. PubMed ID: 17601320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Forensic evaluation of problematic Internet use. Recupero PR J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):505-14. PubMed ID: 19092069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]