These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5678380)

  • 1. The effect of a horizontally structured field and target brightness on visual search and detection times.
    Lovie AD; Lovie P
    Ergonomics; 1968 Jul; 11(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 5678380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual lobe shape and search performance for targets of different difficulty.
    Chan AH; Tang NY
    Ergonomics; 2007 Feb; 50(2):289-318. PubMed ID: 17419160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Visual search training for a case of homonymous field defect with multiple visual dysfunctions].
    Hirayama K; Sakai S; Yamawaki R; Kondo Y; Suzuki T; Fujimoto C; Yamadori A; Mori E
    No To Shinkei; 2004 May; 56(5):403-13. PubMed ID: 15279198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A study of the field of vision based on comparison of visual sensations].
    Khachaturova NK
    Vestn Oftalmol; 1966; 79(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 5982234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Perception at the boundaries of the visual field: experimental data and identification problems].
    Dupas F; Poissonnier B; Jacquesson JM; Malvache N; Milbled G
    Lille Med; 1974 Feb; 19(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 4849367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving residual vision by attentional cueing in patients with brain lesions.
    Poggel DA; Kasten E; Müller-Oehring EM; Bunzenthal U; Sabel BA
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 16777076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Properties of receptive field on binocular fusion stimulation in the central visual field.
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Ohmure K; Matsumoto F; Shimomura Y
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 240(9):743-7. PubMed ID: 12271372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Phenomenon of apparent rarefaction of the visual field].
    Vicario G
    Arch Psicol Neurol Psichiatr; 1971; 32(6):515-42. PubMed ID: 5149281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Further research on the functional asymmetry between the superior and inferior visual hemifields: analysis of the reaction time to simultaneous stimulation of the two hemi-fields].
    Cocito L; Favale E; Tartaglione A
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1979 Jun; 55(11):1077-83. PubMed ID: 549585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of retinal image degradation on pre-attentive visual search (PAVS) efficiency for flicker, movement and orientation stimuli.
    Davison P; Loughman J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Sep; 26(5):456-63. PubMed ID: 16918769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of background constraint on visual search times.
    Brown B
    Ergonomics; 1976 Jul; 19(4):441-9. PubMed ID: 964229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exponent of the latency of brightness power functions in the fovea and periphery of the visual field.
    Osaka N
    J Gen Psychol; 1982 Apr; 106(2d Half):195-203. PubMed ID: 7097258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual-field asymmetry in dual-stream RSVP.
    Holländer A; Corballis MC; Hamm JP
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 15488903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual field recovery after vision restoration therapy (VRT) is independent of eye movements: an eye tracker study.
    Kasten E; Bunzenthal U; Sabel BA
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 175(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 16970999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Virtual evolution for visual search in natural images results in behavioral receptive fields with inhibitory surrounds.
    Zhang S; Abbey CK; Eckstein MP
    Vis Neurosci; 2009; 26(1):93-108. PubMed ID: 19278570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New insights into the subjective perception of visual field defects.
    Hoste AM
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2003; (287):65-71. PubMed ID: 12784579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [1966 review of vision and visual function].
    Oshima S
    Ganka; 1967 Nov; 9(11):771-89. PubMed ID: 4877541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subjective detection of visual field defects using home TV set.
    Shirato S; Adachi M; Hara T
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1991; 35(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 1770667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of driver distraction and low alcohol concentrations on useful field of view and frequency-doubling technology perimetry.
    Puell MC; Barrio A
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 86(6):634-41. PubMed ID: 18081908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peripheral target recognition and visual field narrowing in aviators and nonaviators.
    Williams LJ
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1995; 5(2):215-32. PubMed ID: 11540258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.