These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5679934)

  • 1. First formant transitions and the perception of synthetic semivowels.
    Ainsworth WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1968 Sep; 44(3):689-94. PubMed ID: 5679934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory-motor formant tracking: a study of speech imitation.
    Kent RD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1974 Jun; 17(2):203-22. PubMed ID: 4836041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception of speech sounds with alternate formants presented to opposite ears.
    Ainsworth WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 May; 63(5):1528-34. PubMed ID: 690332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Formant transition duration and speech recognition in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Turner CW; Smith SJ; Aldridge PL; Stewart SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 May; 101(5 Pt 1):2822-5. PubMed ID: 9165736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The imitation of synthetic vowels and some implications for speech memory.
    Kent RD
    Phonetica; 1973; 28(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 4751546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory and phonetic levels of processing in speech perception: neurophysiological and information-processing analyses.
    Wood CC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 Feb; 104(1):3-20. PubMed ID: 1170274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of temporal order in vowel sequences with and without formant transitions.
    Dorman MF; Cutting JE; Raphael LJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 May; 104(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 1194866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vowel and consonant recognition of cochlear implant patients using formant-estimating speech processors.
    Blamey PJ; Dowell RC; Brown AM; Clark GM; Seligman PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jul; 82(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 3624640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users.
    Prévost F; Lehmann A
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between semivowels and vowels: cross-linguistic investigations of acoustic difference and coarticulation.
    Maddieson I; Emmorey K
    Phonetica; 1985; 42(4):163-74. PubMed ID: 3842771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A constraint on the discrimination of speech by young infants.
    Eimas PD; Miller JL
    Lang Speech; 1991; 34 ( Pt 3)():251-63. PubMed ID: 1843526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors affecting vowel formant discrimination by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Liu C; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2855-64. PubMed ID: 18189575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of rapid spectral change in speech by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
    Godfrey JJ; Millay K
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(5):200-8. PubMed ID: 659292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Difference limens for formant patterns of vowel sounds.
    Hawks JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):1074-84. PubMed ID: 8132901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tactile perception of computer-derived formant patterns from voiced speech.
    Kirman JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1974 Jan; 55(1):163-9. PubMed ID: 4815754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of synthetic speech sounds by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Godfrey JJ; Millay KK
    J Aud Res; 1980 Jul; 20(3):187-203. PubMed ID: 7347740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of spectral flattening on vowel identification.
    Dubno JR; Dorman MF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Nov; 82(5):1503-11. PubMed ID: 3693692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of relative amplitude, presentation level, and vowel duration on perception of voiceless stop consonants by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Hedrick MS; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3398-407. PubMed ID: 8914319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Synthetic vowel studies on cochlear implant patients.
    Tong YC; Lim HH; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Sep; 84(3):876-87. PubMed ID: 3183206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.