These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility. Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The development of psychometrically equivalent Cantonese speech audiometry materials. Nissen SL; Harris RW; Channell RW; Conklin B; Kim M; Wong L Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):191-201. PubMed ID: 21319936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lack of effect of contralateral speech discourse on auditory threshold response behavior. Fulton RT; Meyer PA; Cooper SJ J Aud Res; 1982 Apr; 22(2):131-42. PubMed ID: 7187433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterizing the Speech Reception Threshold in hearing-impaired listeners in relation to masker type and masker level. Rhebergen KS; Pool RE; Dreschler WA J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1491-505. PubMed ID: 24606285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Qualitative studies of speech perception for speech audiometry. I. Auditory threshold and phonemic confusion]. Müller G Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1979; 31(3):188-222. PubMed ID: 544400 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Studies on qualitative speech recognition, sound recognition and auditory threshold]. Müller K Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1978; 30(4):303-13. PubMed ID: 730095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring cognitive factors in speech comprehension: the value of using the Text Reception Threshold test as a visual equivalent of the SRT test. Kramer SE; Zekveld AA; Houtgast T Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):507-15. PubMed ID: 19778398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acoustic level and vocal effort as cues for the loudness of speech. Allen GD J Acoust Soc Am; 1971 Jun; 49(6):1831-41. PubMed ID: 5125730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Brainstem Evoked Potential Indices of Subcortical Auditory Processing After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Vander Werff KR; Rieger B Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):e200-e214. PubMed ID: 28319479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychometrically equivalent Russian speech audiometry materials by male and female talkers. Harris RW; Nissen SL; Pola MG; McPherson DL; Tavartkiladze GA; Eggett DL Int J Audiol; 2007 Jan; 46(1):47-66. PubMed ID: 17365055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Effect of Aging and the High-Frequency Auditory Threshold on Speech-Evoked Mismatch Negativity in a Noisy Background. Chen J; Chen S; Zheng Y; Ou Y Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 26650255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Guidelines for determining threshold level for speech. ASHA; 1988 Mar; 30(3):85-9. PubMed ID: 3155355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reference sound pressure level for Korean speech audiometry. Han H; Lee J; Cho S; Kim J; Lee K; Choi WD Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 21047297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of circumaural earphone cushions on threshold sensitivity for speech. Speaks C J Acoust Soc Am; 1969 Dec; 46(6):1515-8. PubMed ID: 5361523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic and environmental influences on hearing in older women. Viljanen A; Era P; Kaprio J; Pyykkö I; Koskenvuo M; Rantanen T J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci; 2007 Apr; 62(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 17452741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The mismatch negativity as a measure of auditory stream segregation in a simulated "cocktail-party" scenario: effect of age. Getzmann S; Näätänen R Neurobiol Aging; 2015 Nov; 36(11):3029-3037. PubMed ID: 26254109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of the TTS paradigm for assessing sound transmission in the auditory system during speech production. Karlovich RS; Luterman BF J Acoust Soc Am; 1970 Feb; 47(2):510-7. PubMed ID: 5439650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]