These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5680787)

  • 1. Exploitation-accommodation and social responsibility in a bargaining game.
    Murdoch P
    J Pers; 1968 Sep; 36(3):440-53. PubMed ID: 5680787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Personality, payoff information, and behavior in a two-person bargaining game.
    Mack D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1972 Apr; 36(2):125-44. PubMed ID: 5023852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of intelligence on payoff demands in a competitive negotiable tetrad game.
    Shears LM; Behrens MG
    Am J Ment Defic; 1968 Nov; 73(3):514-9. PubMed ID: 5699758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Social decision-making: insights from game theory and neuroscience.
    Sanfey AG
    Science; 2007 Oct; 318(5850):598-602. PubMed ID: 17962552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Status and sex of other a determinants of behavior in a mixed-motive game.
    Grant MJ; Sermat V
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1969 Jun; 12(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 5784714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intragroup social influence and intergroup competition.
    Wildschut T; Insko CA; Gaertner L
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Jun; 82(6):975-92. PubMed ID: 12051584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The psychological background of adolescents' behavior in a two-person nonzero sum game.
    Kubicka L
    Behav Sci; 1968 Nov; 13(6):455-66. PubMed ID: 4881966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of sex role in a two-person mixed-motive game.
    McNeel SP; McClintock CG; Nuttin JM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1972 Dec; 24(3):372-80. PubMed ID: 4655546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Personality and strategic choice.
    Sherman R
    J Psychol; 1968 Nov; 70(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 5727451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strategy selection in evolutionary game dynamics on group interaction networks.
    Tan S; Feng S; Wang P; Chen Y
    Bull Math Biol; 2014 Nov; 76(11):2785-805. PubMed ID: 25270102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual differences in coalitional behavior.
    Ashour AS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1975 Jan; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 1117399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Power motive and mathematical behavior in a negotiation game].
    Schnackers UK; Kleinbeck U
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1975; 127(3-4):300-19. PubMed ID: 1232973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of prior exposure to cooperative or competitive treatment upon subject's responding in the prisoner's dilemma.
    Swingle PG
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1968 Sep; 10(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 5682523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marital dysfunctionality and two-person non-zero-sum game behavior: cumulative monadic measures.
    Speer DC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1972 Jan; 21(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 5058252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AFFECTING THE SALIENCE OF THE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY NORM: EFFECTS OF PAST HELP ON THE RESPONSE TO DEPENDENCY RELATIONSHIPS.
    BERKOWITZ L; DANIELS LR
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1964 Mar; 68():275-81. PubMed ID: 14126841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Competitiveness and conflict behavior in simulation of a social dilemma.
    Houston JM; Kinnie J; Lupo B; Terry C; Ho SS
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Jun; 86(3 Pt 2):1219-25. PubMed ID: 10932584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phase transitions in multiplicative competitive processes.
    Shimazaki H; Niebur E
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 Jul; 72(1 Pt 1):011912. PubMed ID: 16090006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of perception and cooperative game behavior.
    Hogan JL; Fisher RH; Morrison BJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Oct; 37(2):391-8. PubMed ID: 4747353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evolution of fairness and coalition formation in three-person ultimatum games.
    Nishimura T; Okada A; Shirata Y
    J Theor Biol; 2017 May; 420():53-67. PubMed ID: 28257763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Origins. On the origin of cooperation.
    Pennisi E
    Science; 2009 Sep; 325(5945):1196-9. PubMed ID: 19729633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.