These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5683712)

  • 1. Test-retest variability in speech discrimination testing.
    Engelberg M
    Laryngoscope; 1968 Sep; 78(9):1582-9. PubMed ID: 5683712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptive speech audiometry and speech discrimination space in hearing-impaired subjects.
    Stevenson PW; Martin MC
    Audiology; 1977; 16(2):110-23. PubMed ID: 849207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Speech audiometry with sentences. I. Principles and test material of the diagnosis of whole speech perception].
    Niemeyer W
    HNO; 1967 Nov; 15(11):335-43. PubMed ID: 5596449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Correlation between perception of pure tones and speech sounds with respect to bone conduction in otosclerotic patients].
    Shidlovskaia TV
    Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1970; 30(4):38-43. PubMed ID: 5503992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Investigations on the intelligibleness of a new record of the German Freiburg speech discrimination test].
    Plath P; Stühlen HW; Graf H; Pelzer H
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1973 Jun; 52(6):457-69. PubMed ID: 4734046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Studies on shadow hearing in bone conduction during speech audiometry].
    Pálfalvi L; Surján L
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1965 Dec; 44(12):839-44. PubMed ID: 5868116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparative audiometric study of bone conduction and chondral conduction. Its importance in the diagnosis of endo- and retro-cochlear perception deafness].
    Pialoux P; Fontelle P; Chouard CH; Freyss G
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1974 Mar; 91(3):89-97. PubMed ID: 4848331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of speech audiometry by bone conduction in hearing-impaired adults.
    Karlsen EA; Goetzinger CP
    J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 7345063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cochlear implant patient performance on the MAC battery.
    Edgerton BJ; Prietto A; Danhauer JL
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1983 Feb; 16(1):267-80. PubMed ID: 6687933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory threshold impairment and everyday speech reception.
    Macrae JH; Brigden DN
    Audiology; 1973; 12(4):272-90. PubMed ID: 4722026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feasibility of acupuncture as a treatment for sensori-neural deafness in children.
    Rosen S
    Laryngoscope; 1974 Dec; 84(12):2202-17. PubMed ID: 4437258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Clinical studies on temporary characteristics of hearing].
    Belov IM
    Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1968; 28(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 5737148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [On the introduction and practice of speech audiometry in Turkey].
    Cevanşir B
    HNO; 1967 Nov; 15(11):346-9. PubMed ID: 5596451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Frequency discrimination].
    Giaccai F
    JFORL J Fr Otorhinolaryngol Audiophonol Chir Maxillofac; 1972 Mar; 21(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 4261695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The vocal Weber test. Its significance].
    Causse J; Bel J
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1967 Jun; 84(6):419-28. PubMed ID: 6062841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. SISI test in pre-operative mixed-loss patients.
    Pratt LL; Egan JJ
    Laryngoscope; 1968 Nov; 78(11):1965-70. PubMed ID: 5725324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech recognition with the bone-anchored hearing aid determined objectively and subjectively.
    Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Feb; 73(2):115-7. PubMed ID: 8168444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Human auditory sensitivity to low frequency tones in the normal state and in various forms of deafness].
    Sagalovich BM; Pokryvalova KP
    Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1968; 28(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 5737156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.