These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5703673)
1. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists' proposed threshold limit value for noise. Jones HH Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1968; 29(6):537-40. PubMed ID: 5703673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. New noise regulations under the Walsh-Healey Act. Van Atta FA J Occup Med; 1970 Feb; 12(2):27-9. PubMed ID: 5434330 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The burdens of age-related and occupational noise-induced hearing loss in the United States. Dobie RA Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):565-77. PubMed ID: 18469718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sound master noise attenuator. Schiff M; Riedman R Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1971; 75(2):404-7. PubMed ID: 5092566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Determination of sound pressure levels created by noise sources at stnadard points]. Razumov IK Gig Sanit; 1969 Nov; 34(11):29-32. PubMed ID: 5379221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Noise-induced hearing loss and symphony orchestra musicians: risk factors, effects, and management. Teie PU Md Med J; 1998 Jan; 47(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 9448410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Problems raised by prevention of occupational deafness in industrial environments: proposed solutions]. Pepersack JP Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1971; 25(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 5120991 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Noise exposures. Effects on hearing and prevention of noise induced hearing loss. Lusk SL AAOHN J; 1997 Aug; 45(8):397-408; quiz 409-10. PubMed ID: 9341314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Industrial physician and hearing surveillance]. Meyer H HNO; 1971 Nov; 19(11):346-50. PubMed ID: 5138275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Noise-induced hearing loss. Catlin FI Am J Otol; 1986 Mar; 7(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 2938482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Group mean hearing threshold changes in a noise-exposed industrial population using personal hearing protectors. Savell JF; Toothman EH Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Jan; 48(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3565259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hearing conservation: implementing and evaluating a program. Harrison RK AAOHN J; 1989 Apr; 37(4):107-11. PubMed ID: 2518840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Data for hygienic assessment of impulse noise]. Andreeva-Galanina ETs; Suvorov GA; LikhnitskiÄ AM Gig Sanit; 1968 Aug; 33(8):24-9. PubMed ID: 5728782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reduce noise-induced hearing loss with precautions at home and work. Strasser AL Occup Health Saf; 1989 Nov; 58(12):47. PubMed ID: 2594302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Explore the world of hearing loss prevention. Foreword. Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50 Suppl 1():S1-2. PubMed ID: 21288062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Use of the temporary shift of the auditory threshold in the evaluation of the efficiency of an ear protector from a specific industrial noise]. Merluzzi F; Ferrari O Med Lav; 1969 May; 60(5):366-74. PubMed ID: 5405685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Some aspects of noise in an industrial environment: research performed on a group of hydroelectric power plants]. Lacquaniti A; Manfredda GE; Meo G Med Lav; 1967 Jan; 58(1):41-59. PubMed ID: 5602598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]