These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5706541)

  • 21. Selective attention and pigeons' multiple necessary cues discrimination learning.
    Teng Y; Vyazovska OV; Wasserman EA
    Behav Processes; 2015 Mar; 112():61-71. PubMed ID: 25150067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Temporal generalization gradients following an interdimensional discrimination protocol.
    Vieira de Castro AC; Vasconcelos M; Machado A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(9):1701-18. PubMed ID: 26605786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of drug state dimensionality via drug-drug training and stimulus generalization testing.
    Gouvier WD; Akins FR; Trapold MA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1984 Nov; 21(5):687-93. PubMed ID: 6096894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Discrimination learning as the summation of excitation and inhibition.
    Hearst E
    Science; 1968 Dec; 162(3859):1303-6. PubMed ID: 5699210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Effects of change-over-delay in the signal-key procedure].
    Manabe K; Kawashima T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1982 Dec; 53(5):304-7. PubMed ID: 7169710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of generalization functions and frame of reference effects in different training paradigms.
    Thomas DR; Lusky M; Morrison S
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Jun; 51(6):529-40. PubMed ID: 1620565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Discrimination of compound stimuli involving the presence or absence of a distinctive visual feature.
    Farthing GW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Nov; 16(3):327-36. PubMed ID: 5150043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Brightness contrast: a reinterpretation of compound cue and combined cue experiments with pigeons.
    Santiago HC; Wright AA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Jan; 33(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 7365405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Investigations of a mirror-image transfer effect in pigeons.
    Thomas DR; Klipec W; Lyons J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1966 Sep; 9(5):567-71. PubMed ID: 5964513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attentional tradeoffs in the pigeon.
    Vyazovska OV; Teng Y; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):337-54. PubMed ID: 24634281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Natural concepts in pigeons.
    Hernstein RJ; Loveland DH; Cable C
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1976 Oct; 2(4):285-302. PubMed ID: 978139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The interaction of temporal generalization gradients predicts the context effect.
    de Castro AC; Machado A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 May; 97(3):263-79. PubMed ID: 22693358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Generalization after form discrimination in light-reared and dark-reared rats.
    Tees RC; Midgley G; Nesbit JC
    Dev Psychobiol; 1982 Mar; 15(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 7095283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stimulus generalization as a function of discrimination learning with and without errors.
    Lyons J
    Science; 1969 Jan; 163(3866):490-1. PubMed ID: 5762403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. GENERALIZATION GRADIENTS FOLLOWING TWO-RESPONSE DISCRIMINATION TRAINING.
    RISLEY T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Mar; 7(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 14130105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION ALONG A LIGHT FLICKER RATE CONTINUUM AFTER DISCRIMINATION TRAINING WITH SEVERAL S-'S.
    SLOANE HN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 May; 7(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 14143907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stimulus generalization and operant context renewal.
    Podlesnik CA; Miranda-Dukoski L
    Behav Processes; 2015 Oct; 119():93-8. PubMed ID: 26241660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Preferences among stimulus matches in the pigeon.
    Pisacreta R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Sep; 38(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 6890092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An investigation of peak shift and behavioral contrast for autoshaped and operant behavior.
    Bushnell MC; Weiss SJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Jan; 33(1):101-18. PubMed ID: 7365398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND THE RESPONSE-REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY.
    HEARST E; KORESKO MB; POPPEN R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Sep; 7(5):369-80. PubMed ID: 14218295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.