These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 571164)

  • 1. Laboratory comparison of urethral profilometry techniques.
    Teague CT; Merrill DC
    Urology; 1979 Feb; 13(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 571164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Study of threee urethral pressure recording devices: theoretical considerations.
    Jonas U; Klotter HJ
    Urol Res; 1978; 6(3):119-25. PubMed ID: 568336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative study of air and water measurements of peak and stabilized static urethral pressures.
    Teague CT; Merrill DC
    Urology; 1978 Oct; 12(4):481-6. PubMed ID: 568841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Three dimensional urethral pressure profile. II. Basic consideration of the catheter with only one eye and comparison with the catheter with the tip transducer by Millar].
    Morita T; Nishimoto T; Noto H
    Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Oct; 74(10):1772-7. PubMed ID: 6676557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The urethral pressure profile during flow. An experimental study.
    Asklin B; Erlandson BE; Johansson G; Pettersson S
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 1984; 18(4):257-67. PubMed ID: 6505641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Urethral pressure profile. Standardization of technique and study of reproducibility.
    Ghoneim MA; Gottembourg JL; Fretin J; Susset JG
    Urology; 1975 May; 5(5):632-7. PubMed ID: 1168962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A catheter withdrawing apparatus for clinical urethral pressure profile studies.
    Lowe PJ; Saunders GA; Downie JW; Awad SA
    J Urol; 1976 Nov; 116(5):636-8. PubMed ID: 978817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intraurethral pressure recording. A comparison betwen tip-transducer catheters and open-end catheters with constant flow.
    Asmussen M
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 1976; 10(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 944949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The characteristics of the bladder-sphincter reflex in children].
    Salov PP; Zakharova NS
    Urol Nefrol (Mosk); 1990; (6):7-9. PubMed ID: 2089772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual pressure transducer catheter for evaluating vesicourethral function: experiences in patients with neurogenic bladder.
    Yalla SV; Rossier AB; Fam B; Gabilondo FB
    Urology; 1976 Aug; 8(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 986714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Urethral pressure profile in children: a comparison between perfused catheters and micro-transducers, and a study of the usefulness of urethral pressure profile measurements in children.
    Meunier P; Mollard P
    J Urol; 1978 Aug; 120(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 671637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Urethral pressure profilometry with membrane catheter compared with perfusion catheter systems.
    Schmidt RA; Witherow R; van Gool JD; Tanagho EA
    Urol Int; 1978; 33(5):345-54. PubMed ID: 705985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility of urethral pressure profiles in clinically normal sexually intact female dogs by use of microtransducer catheters.
    Arnold S; Chew DJ; Hubler M; Casal M; Wiestner T; Hogg H; Heckmann R; Powers J; Ruesch P
    Am J Vet Res; 1993 Aug; 54(8):1347-51. PubMed ID: 8214908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resting and stress urethral pressures as a clinical guide to the mechanism of continence in the female patient.
    Constantinou CE
    Urol Clin North Am; 1985 May; 12(2):247-58. PubMed ID: 4039486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative study of water perfusion catheters and microtip transducer catheters for urethral pressure measurements.
    Kuhn A; Nager CW; Hawkins E; Schulz J; Stanton SL
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2007 Aug; 18(8):931-5. PubMed ID: 17131168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In-vivo determination of error in the measurement of urethral pressure by the method of Brown and Wickham.
    Brown M
    Br J Urol; 1975 Aug; 47(4):445-8. PubMed ID: 1237339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 'Simultaneous' urethral pressure profilometry in the bitch: methodology and reproducibility of the technique.
    Holt PE
    Res Vet Sci; 1989 Jul; 47(1):110-6. PubMed ID: 2772399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Membrane catheter: effective for recording pressure in lower urinary tract.
    Tanagho EA; Jonas U
    Urology; 1977 Aug; 10(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 561471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional urethral obstruction in 3 dogs: clinical and urethral pressure profile findings.
    Lane IF; Fischer JR; Miller E; Grauer GF; Lappin MR
    J Vet Intern Med; 2000; 14(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 10668816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of alpha 1-adrenoceptor agonists in canine urethral pressure profilometry and abdominal leak point pressure models.
    Brune ME; O'Neill AB; Gauvin DM; Katwala SP; Altenbach RJ; Brioni JD; Hancock AA; Sullivan JP
    J Urol; 2001 Oct; 166(4):1555-9. PubMed ID: 11547130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.