These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5713803)

  • 21. Long-term selection for rapid gain in mice. II. Correlated changes in reproduction.
    Barria N; Bradford GE
    J Anim Sci; 1981 Apr; 52(4):739-47. PubMed ID: 7196398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Optimizing female allocation to reproductive technologies considering merit, inbreeding and cost in nucleus breeding programmes with genomic selection.
    Granleese T; Clark SA; Kinghorn BP; van der Werf JHJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Mar; 136(2):79-90. PubMed ID: 30585664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Predicting response to selection on a quantitative trait: a comparison between models for mixed-mating populations.
    Kelly JK; Williamson S
    J Theor Biol; 2000 Nov; 207(1):37-56. PubMed ID: 11027478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Inbreeding promotes female promiscuity.
    Michalczyk Ł; Millard AL; Martin OY; Lumley AJ; Emerson BC; Chapman T; Gage MJ
    Science; 2011 Sep; 333(6050):1739-42. PubMed ID: 21940892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comment on "Additive genetic breeding values correlate with the load of partially deleterious mutations".
    Postma E
    Science; 2011 Sep; 333(6047):1221. PubMed ID: 21885758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genetics of Darwinian fitness. II. Pleiotropic selection on fertility and survival.
    Abugov R
    J Theor Biol; 1985 May; 114(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 4010307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sexual selection protects against extinction.
    Lumley AJ; Michalczyk Ł; Kitson JJ; Spurgin LG; Morrison CA; Godwin JL; Dickinson ME; Martin OY; Emerson BC; Chapman T; Gage MJ
    Nature; 2015 Jun; 522(7557):470-3. PubMed ID: 25985178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fitness benefits of prolonged post-reproductive lifespan in women.
    Lahdenperä M; Lummaa V; Helle S; Tremblay M; Russell AF
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6979):178-81. PubMed ID: 15014499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Inbreeding avoidance through kin recognition: choosy females boost male dispersal.
    Lehmann L; Perrin N
    Am Nat; 2003 Nov; 162(5):638-52. PubMed ID: 14618541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evidence for overdominant selection maintaining X-linked fitness variation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Connallon T; Knowles LL
    Evolution; 2006 Jul; 60(7):1445-53. PubMed ID: 16929661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sex-biased inbreeding effects on reproductive success and home range size of the critically endangered black rhinoceros.
    Cain B; Wandera AB; Shawcross SG; Edwin Harris W; Stevens-Wood B; Kemp SJ; Okita-Ouma B; Watts PC
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Apr; 28(2):594-603. PubMed ID: 24641512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A resource allocation model describing consequences of artificial selection under metabolic stress.
    van der Waaij EH
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Apr; 82(4):973-81. PubMed ID: 15080316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reciprocal recurrent selection for 21-day litter weight of crossbred gilts. II. Reproductive performance of purebred females producing purebred and two-way cross litters and performance of purebred and crossbred pigs.
    Young LD; Omtvedt IT; Whatley JA; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1983 Dec; 57(6):1431-9. PubMed ID: 6674283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Linoleic acid requirement of the hen for reproduction.
    Menge H
    J Nutr; 1968 Aug; 95(4):578-82. PubMed ID: 5665658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genetic evaluation of reproductive potential in the Zatorska goose under a conservation program.
    Graczyk M; Andres K; Kapkowska E; Szwaczkowski T
    Anim Sci J; 2018 May; 89(5):752-759. PubMed ID: 29508507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Direct responses in males and correlated responses for reproduction in females to selection for testicular size adjusted for body weight in young male lambs.
    Haley CS; Lee GJ; Ritchie M; Land RB
    J Reprod Fertil; 1990 Jul; 89(2):383-96. PubMed ID: 2401970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dominance rank, fear scores and reproduction in cockerels.
    Shabalina AT
    Br Poult Sci; 1984 Jul; 25(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 6478275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. PROTEIN LEVELS IN GROWING DIETS AND REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF COCKERELS.
    Wilson HR; Waldroup PW; Jones JE; Duerre DJ; Harmds RH
    J Nutr; 1965 Jan; 85(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 14256999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Selection with restriction in a poultry breeding scheme with different selection procedures in both sexes: direct responses.
    Hagger C; Abplanalp H
    Br Poult Sci; 1988 Jun; 29(2):251-63. PubMed ID: 3409072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ten generations of selection for predicted weight of testes in swine: direct response and correlated response in body weight, backfat, age at puberty, and ovulation rate.
    Johnson RK; Eckardt GR; Rathje TA; Drudik DK
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Aug; 72(8):1978-88. PubMed ID: 7982825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.