148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 571943)
1. Cardiac valve replacement in children: comparison of tissue with mechanical prostheses.
Sade RM; Ballenger JF; Hohn AR; Arrants JE; Riopel DA; Taylor AB
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1979 Jul; 78(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 571943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Late failure of porcine valve heterografts in children.
Geha AS; Laks H; Stansel HC; Cornhill JF; Kilman JW; Buckley MJ; Roberts WC
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1979 Sep; 78(3):351-64. PubMed ID: 470416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Late results after left-sided cardiac valve replacement in children.
Milano A; Vouhé PR; Baillot-Vernant F; Donzeau-Gouge P; Trinquet F; Roux PM; Leca F; Neveux JY
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Aug; 92(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 3736079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Age as a determinant for selection of porcine bioprostheses for cardiac valve replacement: experience with Carpentier-Edwards standard bioprosthesis.
Jamieson WR; Tyers GF; Janusz MT; Miyagishima RT; Munro AI; Ling H; Burr LH; Tutassaura H
Can J Cardiol; 1991 May; 7(4):181-8. PubMed ID: 2070287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors affecting performance and thromboembolism after porcine xenograft cardiac valve replacement.
Geha AS; Hammond GL; Laks H; Stansel HC; Glenn WW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982 Mar; 83(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 7062749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An eight-year experience with porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves.
Hartz RS; Fisher EB; Finkelmeier B; DeBoer A; Sanders JH; Moran JM; Michaelis LL
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 91(6):910-7. PubMed ID: 3713240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prosthetic valves or tissue valves--a vote for mechanical prostheses.
Horstkotte D
Z Kardiol; 1985; 74 Suppl 6():19-37. PubMed ID: 4096074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement.
Khan SS; Trento A; DeRobertis M; Kass RM; Sandhu M; Czer LS; Blanche C; Raissi S; Fontana GP; Cheng W; Chaux A; Matloff JM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Aug; 122(2):257-69. PubMed ID: 11479498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine aortic valves: a ten-year experience.
David TE; Feindel CM; Scully HE; Bos J; Rakowski H
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 9651835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis. A first-generation tissue valve with excellent long-term clinical performance.
Jamieson WR; Allen P; Miyagishima RT; Gerein AN; Munro AI; Burr LH; Tyers GF
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 Mar; 99(3):543-61. PubMed ID: 2308373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Valve-related complications with the Hancock I porcine bioprosthesis. A twelve- to fourteen-year follow-up study.
Bernal JM; Rabasa JM; Cagigas JC; Echevarria JR; Carrion MF; Revuelta JM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 May; 101(5):871-80. PubMed ID: 2023444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mitral valve replacement in children.
Human DG; Joffe HS; Fraser CB; Barnard CN
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982 Jun; 83(6):873-7. PubMed ID: 7087514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis in the mitral position: a 10-year follow up of St. Jude Medical and Biocor valves.
Demirag M; Kirali K; Omeroglu SN; Mansuroglu D; Akinci E; Ipek G; Berki T; Gürbüz A; Isik O; Yakut C
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 11206772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. More than ten years' follow-up of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in Japan.
Kawachi Y; Tanaka J; Tominaga R; Kinoshita K; Tokunaga K
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Jul; 104(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 1614215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Porcine heterograft valve replacement in children.
Williams DB; Danielson GK; McGoon DC; Puga FJ; Mair DD; Edwards WD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982 Sep; 84(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 7109674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The homograft aortic valve: a 29-year, 99.3% follow up of 1,022 valve replacements.
O'Brien MF; Harrocks S; Stafford EG; Gardner MA; Pohlner PG; Tesar PJ; Stephens F
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):334-44; discussion 335. PubMed ID: 11380096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical valves versus the Ross procedure for aortic valve replacement in children: propensity-adjusted comparison of long-term outcomes.
Alsoufi B; Al-Halees Z; Manlhiot C; McCrindle BW; Al-Ahmadi M; Sallehuddin A; Canver CC; Bulbul Z; Joufan M; Fadel B
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Feb; 137(2):362-370.e9. PubMed ID: 19185153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population.
Bottio T; Rizzoli G; Caprili L; Testolin L; Thiene G; Gerosa G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 16116876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mitral valve disease: if the mitral valve is not reparable/failed repair, is bioprosthesis suitable for replacement?
Jamieson WR; Gudas VM; Burr LH; Janusz MT; Fradet GJ; Ling H; Germann E; Lichtenstein SV
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 19056294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Aortic valve replacement: technique and outcome with artificial heart valves and allografts].
Vogt PR; Turina MI
Ther Umsch; 1998 Dec; 55(12):737-45. PubMed ID: 10025187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
