148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 571943)
21. Early and late risk of aortic valve replacement. A 12 year concomitant comparison of the porcine bioprosthetic and tilting disc prosthetic aortic valves.
Cohn LH; Allred EN; DiSesa VJ; Sawtelle K; Shemin RJ; Collins JJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Nov; 88(5 Pt 1):695-705. PubMed ID: 6492838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial.
Chaudhry MA; Raco L; Muriithi EW; Bernacca GM; Tolland MM; Wheatley DJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Tricuspid valve replacement: bioprostheses are preferable.
Dalrymple-Hay MJ; Leung Y; Ohri SK; Haw MP; Ross JK; Livesey SA; Monro JL
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov; 8(6):644-8. PubMed ID: 10616242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine bioprosthesis. Clinical experience and implantation characteristics.
Jamieson WR; Gerein AN; Tyers GF; Janusz MT; Munro AI; Jyrala AJ; Miyagishima RT; Allen P
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Apr; 91(4):555-65. PubMed ID: 3959575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses.
Brown ML; Schaff HV; Lahr BD; Mullany CJ; Sundt TM; Dearani JA; McGregor CG; Orszulak TA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 135(4):878-84; discussion 884. PubMed ID: 18374773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Early and late risk of mitral valve replacement. A 12 year concomitant comparison of the porcine bioprosthetic and prosthetic disc mitral valves.
Cohn LH; Allred EN; Cohn LA; Austin JC; Sabik J; DiSesa VJ; Shemin RJ; Collins JJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Dec; 90(6):872-81. PubMed ID: 4068737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of porcine valve xenografts with mechanical prostheses. A 7 1/2 year experience.
Joyce LD; Nelson RM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Jul; 88(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 6738092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén PS
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Mechanical valve replacement in congenital heart disease in children.
Lubiszewska B; Rozanski J; Szufladowicz M; Szaroszyk W; Hoffman P; Ksiezycka E; Rydlewska-Sadowska W; Ruzyllo W
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 10096487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses assessed by composites of valve-related complications to 15 years after aortic valve replacement.
Chan V; Jamieson WR; Germann E; Chan F; Miyagishima RT; Burr LH; Janusz MT; Ling H; Fradet GJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Jun; 131(6):1267-73. PubMed ID: 16733156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Long-term follow-up after mitral valve replacement in childhood: poor event-free survival in the young child.
Beierlein W; Becker V; Yates R; Tsang V; Elliott M; de Leval M; van Doorn C
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 May; 31(5):860-5. PubMed ID: 17383889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Aortic and mitral valve surgery on the beating heart is lowering cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp time.
Gersak B; Sutlic Z
Heart Surg Forum; 2002; 5(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 12125670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses.
Fann JI; Miller DC; Moore KA; Mitchell RS; Oyer PE; Stinson EB; Robbins RC; Reitz BA; Shumway NE
Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
Mudra H; Rudolph W
Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Early follow-up of patients with the Medtronic Intact porcine valve. A new cardiac bioprosthesis.
Jaffe WM; Barratt-Boyes BG; Sadri A; Gavin JB; Coverdale HA; Neutze JM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Aug; 98(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 2755151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Use of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis: assessment of a patient selection policy.
Louagie Y; Noirhomme P; Aranguis E; Eucher P; Vanruyssevelt P; Buche M; Dion R; Jaumin P; Schoevaerdts JC; Chalant CH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Oct; 104(4):1013-24. PubMed ID: 1405658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Experience with aortic and mitral valve replacement in children.
Williams WG; Pollock JC; Geiss DM; Trusler GA; Fowler RS
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1981 Mar; 81(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 7464196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative analysis of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves after aortic valve replacement.
Borkon AM; Soule LM; Baughman KL; Aoun H; Baumgartner WA; Gardner TJ; Watkins L; Gott VL; Reitz BA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Jul; 94(1):20-33. PubMed ID: 3600005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Six-and-half years' experience with the St. Jude BioImplant porcine prosthesis.
Triggiani M; D'Ancona G; Nascimbene S; Benussi S; Donatelli F; Paolini G; Galli L; Grossi A
J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Mar; 6(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 9130121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative evaluation of mitral valve repair and replacement with Starr, Björk, and porcine valve prostheses.
Perier P; Deloche A; Chauvaud S; Fabiani JN; Rossant P; Bessou JP; Relland J; Bourezak H; Gomez F; Blondeau P
Circulation; 1984 Sep; 70(3 Pt 2):I187-92. PubMed ID: 6744563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
