These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 571943)

  • 41. Five-year evaluation of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis.
    Jamieson WR; Pelletier LC; Janusz MT; Chaitman BR; Tyers FO; Miyagishima RT
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Sep; 88(3):324-33. PubMed ID: 6381888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Structural changes of Hancock bioprostheses in children (author's transl)].
    Bortolotti U; Milano A; Mazzucco A; Callucci V; Valente M; Del Maschio A; Valfrè C; Thiene G
    G Ital Cardiol; 1980; 10(11):1520-5. PubMed ID: 7202899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Clinical and hemodynamic results following triple valve replacement: mechanical vs porcine xenograft prostheses.
    Rhodes GR; McIntosh CL; Redwood DR; Itscoitz SB; Epstein SE
    Circulation; 1977 Sep; 56(3 Suppl):II122-7. PubMed ID: 884816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Durability of porcine valves at fifteen years in a representative North American patient population.
    Burdon TA; Miller DC; Oyer PE; Mitchell RS; Stinson EB; Starnes VA; Shumway NE
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Feb; 103(2):238-51; discussion 251-2. PubMed ID: 1735989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Primary isolated aortic valve replacement. Early and late results.
    Lytle BW; Cosgrove DM; Taylor PC; Goormastic M; Stewart RW; Golding LA; Gill CC; Loop FD
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 May; 97(5):675-94. PubMed ID: 2709860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
    Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement: predictors of adverse outcome.
    Kuwaki K; Tsukamoto M; Komatsu K; Morishita K; Sakata J; Abe T
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 12701788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Heart valves from pigs and the porcine endogenous retrovirus: experimental and clinical data to assess the probability of porcine endogenous retrovirus infection in human subjects.
    Moza AK; Mertsching H; Herden T; Bader A; Haverich A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Apr; 121(4):697-701. PubMed ID: 11279410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Valve prostheses of mitral position in children].
    Shimoyama Y; Wanibuchi Y; Ino T; Terada Y; Takagi H; Furuta S; Imamura H; Takeuchi S; Shimizu H; Inoue T
    Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Jan; 38(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 2329286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Clinical comparison of mitral valve replacement using porcine, Starr, and Bjork valves.
    Perier P; Deloche A; Chauvaud S; Fabiani JN; Stephan Y; Dreyfus G; Castaldo F; Blondeau P; Carpentier A
    J Card Surg; 1988 Sep; 3(3 Suppl):359-68. PubMed ID: 2980038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Reassessment of usefulness of porcine heterografts in mitral position in children.
    Rao PS; Solymar L; Fawzy ME; Guinn G
    Pediatr Cardiol; 1991 Jul; 12(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 1876515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Is the Hancock porcine valve the best cardiac valve substitute today?
    Davila JC; Magilligan DJ; Lewis JW
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1978 Oct; 26(4):303-16. PubMed ID: 753143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Current status of cardiac valve prosthesis].
    Komatsu S
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Sep; 86(9):1011-4. PubMed ID: 4088196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Porcine bioprosthetic heart valves: The next generation.
    Manji RA; Menkis AH; Ekser B; Cooper DK
    Am Heart J; 2012 Aug; 164(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 22877802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Porcine valves.
    Angell WW; Angell JD
    Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 1980; 23(2):141-66. PubMed ID: 6774381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Cardiac valve replacement (1963-1979).
    Windsor HM; Shanahan MX; Chang VP
    Med J Aust; 1979 Jul; 2(2):53-6. PubMed ID: 492023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Seven year experience with mounted porcine valves.
    Albert HM; Bryant LR; Schechter FG
    Ann Surg; 1977 Jun; 185(6):717-23. PubMed ID: 871225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Heterograft valve replacement experience.
    Bunton RW; Feint JA; Molloy PJ
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1982 Dec; 52(6):550-3. PubMed ID: 6984648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthesis: a comparative study analyzing failure rates by age.
    Pupello DF; Bessone LN; Hiro SP; Lopez-Cuenca E; Glatterer MS; Ebra G
    J Card Surg; 1988 Sep; 3(3 Suppl):369-74. PubMed ID: 2980039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Biological heart valves.
    Ciubotaru A; Cebotari S; Tudorache I; Beckmann E; Hilfiker A; Haverich A
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2013 Oct; 58(5):389-97. PubMed ID: 24101369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.