These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 572361)
1. Effect of recovery medium and incubation conditions on bacterial counts from plants treating aerobic piggery waste. Johnston DW; Ogilvie SM J Appl Bacteriol; 1979 Apr; 46(2):395-9. PubMed ID: 572361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Enumeration and isolation of anaerobic microbiota of piggery wastes. Spoelstra SF Appl Environ Microbiol; 1978 May; 35(5):841-6. PubMed ID: 566081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Animal husbandry complexes and the protection of the environment from bacterial pollution]. Mereniuk GV; Diskalenko AP; Ponomareva GI Gig Sanit; 1979 Feb; (2):69-72. PubMed ID: 153876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of vegetated filter strips in retention of Escherichia coli and Salmonella from swine manure slurry. Cardoso F; Shelton D; Sadeghi A; Shirmohammadi A; Pachepsky Y; Dulaney W J Environ Manage; 2012 Nov; 110():1-7. PubMed ID: 22705854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes of Microbial Diversity During Swine Manure Treatment Process. Kim M; Yun JI; Won SG; Park KH Pol J Microbiol; 2018 Mar; 67(1):109-112. PubMed ID: 30015432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bacterial responses to temperature during aeration of pig slurry. Zhu J; Ndegwa PM; Luo A J Environ Sci Health B; 2002 May; 37(3):265-75. PubMed ID: 12009197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of oxygen and temperature on the dynamic of the dominant bacterial populations of pig manure and on the persistence of pig-associated genetic markers, assessed in river water microcosms. Marti R; Mieszkin S; Solecki O; Pourcher AM; Hervio-Heath D; Gourmelon M J Appl Microbiol; 2011 Nov; 111(5):1159-75. PubMed ID: 21854514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Potential of low-temperature anaerobic digestion to address current environmental concerns on swine production. Massé DI; Masse L; Xia Y; Gilbert Y J Anim Sci; 2010 Apr; 88(13 Suppl):E112-20. PubMed ID: 19855002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of composting process on the dissipation of extractable sulfonamides in swine manure. Liu B; Li Y; Zhang X; Feng C; Gao M; Shen Q Bioresour Technol; 2015 Jan; 175():284-90. PubMed ID: 25459834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of piggery waste to nightsoil plant towards sustainable development. Eum Y; Oa SW; Choi E Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(10):147-53. PubMed ID: 12862229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation and use of a low nutrient medium and reduced incubation temperature to study bacterial contamination in the water supply of dental units. Williams HN; Quinby H; Romberg E Can J Microbiol; 1994 Feb; 40(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 8019935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Speciation change of heavy metals during composting process of chicken manure]. Wang YJ; Dou S; Li YD; Chen X; Zhang JJ Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2009 Mar; 30(3):913-7. PubMed ID: 19432350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bacterial community analysis of swine manure treated with autothermal thermophilic aerobic digestion. Han I; Congeevaram S; Ki DW; Oh BT; Park J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2011 Feb; 89(3):835-42. PubMed ID: 20922382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chemical and microbiological studies on leachates from a waste tip. Riley RD; Benedict RG; Seabloom RW; Carlson DA J Appl Bacteriol; 1977 Apr; 42(2):285-8. PubMed ID: 326747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of the efficiency of 2 culture media in the recovery of heterotrophic bacteria damaged with chlorine]. Guerrero JJ Rev Argent Microbiol; 1987; 19(4):161-4. PubMed ID: 3332384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of the bacterial flora isolated from a pilot-scale lagoon processing swine manure. Chikh G; Pourquié J; Kaiser P; Davila AM Can J Microbiol; 1997 Nov; 43(11):1079-83. PubMed ID: 9436310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Plant oils thymol and eugenol affect cattle and swine waste emissions differently. Varel VH; Miller DN; Lindsay AD Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):207-13. PubMed ID: 15484763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The potential ability of swine nutrition to influence environmental factors positively. Petersen ST J Anim Sci; 2010 Apr; 88(13 Suppl):E95-E101. PubMed ID: 19897627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of esterase-producing Ureibacillus thermosphaericus isolated from an aerobic digestor of swine waste. Gagné A; Chicoine M; Morin A; Houde A Can J Microbiol; 2001 Oct; 47(10):908-15. PubMed ID: 11718544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Studies on freshwater bacteria: effect of medium composition and method on estimates of bacterial population. Jones JG J Appl Bacteriol; 1970 Dec; 33(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 4930565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]