These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 572454)

  • 1. In vitro durability of Hancock Model 242 porcine heart valve.
    Clark RE; Swanson WM
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1979 Aug; 78(2):277-80. PubMed ID: 572454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The pulmonary bioprosthetic heart valve: its unsuitability for use as an aortic valve replacement.
    Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Booth C; Watterson KG; Fisher J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep; 11(5):668-78; discussion 679. PubMed ID: 12358404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Severe aortic insufficiency secondary to an aortic bioprosthesis tear.
    Beauchesne LM; Veinot JP; Higginson LA; Mesana T
    Cardiovasc Pathol; 2004; 13(3):165-7. PubMed ID: 15081473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The stentless bioprosthesis: surgical challenges and implications for long-term durability.
    Barratt-Boyes BG; Christie GW; Raudkivi PJ
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S39-42; discussion S43. PubMed ID: 1389277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
    Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro pulsatile flow evaluation of a stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis.
    Sung HW; Le TN; Kingsbury CJ; Quintero LJ; Myers KE; Quijano RC
    ASAIO J; 1995; 41(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 7727828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Hemodynamic evaluation of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis and the Hancock pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic position].
    Cohen-Solal A; Leroy G; Hittinger L; Fernandez F; Gay J; Gourgon R
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1986 Mar; 79(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 3087318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cyclic loading response of bioprosthetic heart valves: effects of fixation stress state on the collagen fiber architecture.
    Wells SM; Sellaro T; Sacks MS
    Biomaterials; 2005 May; 26(15):2611-9. PubMed ID: 15585264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of fixation back pressure and antimineralization treatment on the morphology of porcine aortic bioprosthetic valves.
    Flomenbaum MA; Schoen FJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Jan; 105(1):154-64. PubMed ID: 8419696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro hydrodynamic comparison of mitral valve prostheses at high flow rates.
    Gabbay S; McQueen DM; Yellin EL; Becker RM; Frater RW
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1978 Dec; 76(6):771-87. PubMed ID: 713584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental studies of the anatomical and functional characteristics of kangaroo aortic valve bioprostheses.
    Weinhold C; Reichart B; Kemkes BM; Schaff J; Davila J; Eberhard C
    Life Support Syst; 1984; 2(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 6482505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hemodynamic function of the Hancock standard orifice aortic valve bioprosthesis.
    Borkon AM; McIntosh CL; Jones M; Lipson LC; Kent KM; Morrow AG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1981 Oct; 82(4):601-7. PubMed ID: 7278353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro function and durability of a polyurethane heart valve: material considerations.
    Bernacca GM; Mackay TG; Wheatley DJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Sep; 5(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 8894995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
    Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Durability of prosthetic heart valves.
    Clark RE; Swanson WM; Kardos JL; Hagen RW; Beauchamp RA
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1978 Oct; 26(4):323-35. PubMed ID: 753145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel pulse duplicator system: evaluation of different valve prostheses.
    Haaf P; Steiner M; Attmann T; Pfister G; Cremer J; Lutter G
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Feb; 57(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19169990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Structural changes of Hancock bioprostheses in children (author's transl)].
    Bortolotti U; Milano A; Mazzucco A; Callucci V; Valente M; Del Maschio A; Valfrè C; Thiene G
    G Ital Cardiol; 1980; 10(11):1520-5. PubMed ID: 7202899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Porcine valves: Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses.
    Fann JI; Miller DC
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jul; 8(3):259-68. PubMed ID: 8843517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hydrodynamic performance of the Medtronic Freestyle Aortic Root Bioprosthesis.
    Yoganathan AP; Eberhardt CE; Walker PG
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Sep; 3(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 8000594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemodynamic and clinical comparison of the Hancock modified orifice and standard orifice bioprostheses in the aortic position.
    Rossiter SJ; Miller DC; Stinson EB; Oyer PE; Reitz BA; Moreno-Cabral RJ; Mace JG; Robert EW; Tsagaris TJ; Sutton RB; Alderman EL; Shumway NE
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Jul; 80(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 7382536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.