These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Efferent system in the retina of the frog, Rana catesbiana. Tasaki K; Tsukahara Y; Watanabe M Sens Processes; 1978 Dec; 2(4):396-407. PubMed ID: 314669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [On a mathematical relationship recording the chronology of evoked potentials. Relationships between retinal potentials and evoked visual potentials]. Dubouloz P; Kaphan G; Corriol J; Chau-Huu D J Physiol (Paris); 1968; 60(3):171-92. PubMed ID: 5725947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Responses of the amacrine cell to optic nerve stimulation in the frog retina. Matsumoto N Vision Res; 1975 Apr; 15(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 1079386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Centrifugal influences on the amacrine cells of the frog retina]. Byzov AL; Utina IA Neirofiziologiia; 1971; 3(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 4363535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Retino-tegmental projections in the brain of the frog Rana temporaria]. Aleksandrova TA Zh Evol Biokhim Fiziol; 1972; 8(4):456-8. PubMed ID: 4543952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [The evoked potentials and impulse activity of individual neurons of the frog midbrain tectum upon rhythmic stimulation of the optic nerve]. Manteĭfel' IuB; Lastochkina NA Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1970 Nov; 56(11):1561-9. PubMed ID: 4324289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [The electrical phenomena in the visual pathway occur in response to direct electrical stimulation of the retina]. Kondo N Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1970 Aug; 74(8):965-71. PubMed ID: 5466221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Müller cell depolarization evoked by antidromic optic nerve stimulation. Miller RF; Dacheux R; Proenza L Brain Res; 1977 Jan; 121(1):162-6. PubMed ID: 832152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Optic nerve terminal arborizations in the frog: shape and orientation inferred from electrophysiological measurements. George SA; Marks WB Exp Neurol; 1974 Mar; 42(3):467-82. PubMed ID: 4545339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Studies on the slow depressive potential of the isolated frog retina. Hanawa I; Kuge K; Matsumura K Jpn J Physiol; 1967 Jun; 17(3):321-34. PubMed ID: 5299093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Proceedings: 355. Responses of the amacrine cell of the frog retina (author's transl)]. Matsumoto N Nihon Seirigaku Zasshi; 1973; 35(8):531-2. PubMed ID: 4366278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Variations of the superior colliculus evoked response in cats. Pickering SG; Freeman WJ Exp Neurol; 1967 Oct; 19(2):127-39. PubMed ID: 6054719 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Impulse responses of the optic nerve upon stimulation of the retina with acetylcholine]. Trifonow J; Ostrowski MA; Dettmar P Experientia; 1969 Apr; 25(4):370-1. PubMed ID: 5799221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Delayed responses of ganglion cells in the frog retina: the influence of stimulus parameters upon the length of the delay time. Pickering SG; Varjú D Vision Res; 1969 Aug; 9(8):865-79. PubMed ID: 5802395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrophysiology of the intertectal commissures in the pigeon. I. Analysis of the pathways. Robert F; Cuénod M Exp Brain Res; 1969; 9(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 5346458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrophysiology of the intertectal commissures in the pigeon. II. Inhibitory interaction. Robert F; Cuénod M Exp Brain Res; 1969; 9(2):123-36. PubMed ID: 5346459 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Conduction velocity in pathways from retina to superior colliculus in the cat: a correlation with receptive-field properties. Hoffmann KP J Neurophysiol; 1973 May; 36(3):409-24. PubMed ID: 4698317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]