These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5729523)

  • 1. The effects of population size and selection intensity in selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila. I. Short-term response to selection.
    Frankham R; Jones LP; Barker JS
    Genet Res; 1968 Dec; 12(3):237-48. PubMed ID: 5729523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of population size and selection intesnity in selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila. II. Long-term response to selection.
    Jones LP; Frankham R; Barker JS
    Genet Res; 1968 Dec; 12(3):249-66. PubMed ID: 5713599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of population size and selection intensity in selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila. 3. Analyses of the lines.
    Frankham R; Jones LP; Barker JS
    Genet Res; 1968 Dec; 12(3):267-83. PubMed ID: 5713600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of regular cycles of intermittent artificial selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Rathie KA; Barker JS
    Aust J Biol Sci; 1968 Dec; 21(6):1187-213. PubMed ID: 5716084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The effect of directed and stabilizing selection on the population size of Drosophila melanogaster].
    Imasheva AG; Zhivotovskiĭ LA; Lazebnyĭ OE
    Genetika; 1989 Aug; 25(8):1531-3. PubMed ID: 2511072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Effectiveness of selection for thorax length in model Drosophila populations in chemical mutagen exposure].
    Savchenko VK; Eliseeva KG
    Genetika; 1982; 18(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 7199009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring and comparing evolvability and constraint in multivariate characters.
    Hansen TF; Houle D
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1201-19. PubMed ID: 18662244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The genetics of geotaxis in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Walton PD
    Can J Genet Cytol; 1968 Sep; 10(3):673-87. PubMed ID: 5717674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of selection and migration on geotactic and phototactic behaviour of Drosophila. 3.
    Dobzhansky T; Levene H; Spassky B
    Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1972 Jan; 180(1058):21-41. PubMed ID: 4401821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Causes of natural variation in fitness: evidence from studies of Drosophila populations.
    Charlesworth B
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Feb; 112(6):1662-9. PubMed ID: 25572964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Population genetics. (I. Drosophila)].
    Sperlich D
    Fortschr Zool; 1967; 18(2):223-78. PubMed ID: 4872864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variation for metrical characters in drosophila populations. 3. The nature of selection.
    Linney R; Barnes BW; Kearsey MJ
    Heredity (Edinb); 1971 Oct; 27(2):163-74. PubMed ID: 5290164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [A genetic difference model of the population with selection, mutation and migration].
    Sun GW
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 1988; 15(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 3273677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Adaptability of experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster in directed and stabilizing selection].
    Lazebnyĭ OE; Imasheva AG; Zhivotovskiĭ LA
    Genetika; 1991 Oct; 27(10):1726-32. PubMed ID: 1778451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reversal of dominance in the competition between Drosophila nasuta and Drosophila neonasuta.
    Ranganath HA; Krishnamurthy NB
    Experientia; 1975 Mar; 31(3):288-9. PubMed ID: 1116526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selection in experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura with different initial frequencies of chromosomal variants.
    Watanabe T; Anderson WW; Dobzhansky T; Pavlovsky O
    Genet Res; 1970 Feb; 15(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 5415223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic differences between populations of Drosophila melanogaster for a quantitative trait. I. Laboratory populations.
    López-Fanjul C; Hill WG
    Genet Res; 1973 Aug; 22(1):51-68. PubMed ID: 4203701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Natural selection for a metrical trait in a population of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Killick RJ
    Heredity (Edinb); 1970 Feb; 25(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 5004596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic differences between populations of Drosophila melanogaster for a quantitative trait. II. Wild and laboratory populations.
    López-Fanjul C; Hill WG
    Genet Res; 1973 Aug; 22(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 4203702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolution of fitness, 3. Improvement of fitness in irradiated populations of Drosophila serrata.
    Ayala FJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1967 Nov; 58(5):1919-23. PubMed ID: 5237489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.