These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5738749)
61. Use of the vacuum extractor by midwives--what has changed in the last decade? Clark PA J Midwifery Womens Health; 2005; 50(6):517-24. PubMed ID: 16260366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. [Birth injuries of the inferior regions of the spinal cord]. Molotilova TG; Semenova SP; Ratner AIu Zh Nevropatol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova; 1973; 73(10):1460-4. PubMed ID: 4798079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. [Comparative clinical study of forceps and vacuum extractor]. Someda de Marco I Attual Ostet Ginecol; 1966; 12(6):924-32. PubMed ID: 5301330 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. [Unilateral congenital exophthalmia revealing an unusual complication of a vacuum extractor delivery (a case report)]. Touzani KD; Lamari Z; Chraibi F; Abdellaoui M; Andaloussi IB J Fr Ophtalmol; 2018 Oct; 41(8):e351-e353. PubMed ID: 30249454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. [Our clinical experience on the use of the vacuum-extractor. Obstetrical and pediatric considerations]. Cappello F; Mengarda G Minerva Ginecol; 1967 Sep; 19(18):923-5. PubMed ID: 5616712 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. [Our observations in the newborn delivered with a vaccum extractor]. López Cabal J; Aguilar Villanueva S; Sosa Martínez A; Tapia Nava R Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1969 Sep; 26(155):349-54. PubMed ID: 5402852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria. Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. [Studies and comparisons of the degree of fetal distress after the use of the vacuum extractor and forceps]. Cappello F Arch Ostet Ginecol; 1968; 73(3):359-68. PubMed ID: 5742959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. A randomized comparison of vacuum extraction delivery with a rigid and a pliable cup. Kuit JA; Eppinga HG; Wallenburg HC; Huikeshoven FJ Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 82(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 8336878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. [THE SYSTEMATIC USE OF THE OBSTETRICAL VACUUM EXTRACTOR DURING LABOR. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF 1000 CASES]. BEDOYA JM; TORO J Hisp Med; 1963 Aug; 20():425-46. PubMed ID: 14091449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. [EFFECT OF THE VACUUM EXTRACTOR ON THE MOTHER AND CHILD]. ERMAKOVA AIa; TIMOSHENKO LV Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1965; 41():65-70. PubMed ID: 14335298 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. The importance of breech delivery in the pathogenesis of brain damage. End results of a long-term follow-up. Alexopoulos KA Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1973 Apr; 12(4):248-9. PubMed ID: 4121759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Vacuum extraction or forceps? Rydén G Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Jan; 292(6513):75-6. PubMed ID: 3080096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. [Shoulder dystocia as an obstetrical complication]. Quiel V; Glaser A Zentralbl Gynakol; 1985; 107(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 3993266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. [Diseases of newborn infants caused during deliveries]. Shimada N Sanfujinka No Jissai; 1970 May; 19(5):454-66. PubMed ID: 5468300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. [Birth injury in vacuum extraction]. Schaller A Padiatr Grenzgeb; 1970; 9(5):295-313. PubMed ID: 5517799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]