These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5741061)

  • 21. [From sound to hearing, from noise to deafness].
    HENNEBERT PE
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1961; 15():297-314. PubMed ID: 13906471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Development and evaluation of the British English coordinate response measure speech-in-noise test as an occupational hearing assessment tool.
    Semeraro HD; Rowan D; van Besouw RM; Allsopp AA
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):749-758. PubMed ID: 28537138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Investigations on the acoustic threshold and acoustic trauma after exposure to monotonous noise].
    KYLIN B
    Nord Hyg Tidskr; 1960; 41():235-68. PubMed ID: 13755568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Extension and evaluation of a near-end listening enhancement algorithm for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Rennies J; Drefs J; Hülsmeier D; Schepker H; Doclo S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2526. PubMed ID: 28464693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Results of speech audiometry in acoustic trauma].
    Vojacek E
    Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol; 1968; 102(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 5671721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of insertion depth on spatial speech perception in noise for simulations of cochlear implants and single-sided deafness.
    Zhou X; Li H; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Yuan W
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S41-S48. PubMed ID: 27367147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
    Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Preventing hearing loss due to excessive noise exposure.
    Sataloff J
    J Occup Med; 1974 Jul; 16(7):470-1. PubMed ID: 4842003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [A study on noises of a medium degree of loudness and their effect upon occupational deafness. 1. The subjective auditory symptoms of workers engaged in workshops exposed to noises of a medium degree of loudness and statistical observations on hearing test results].
    CHIZUKA K
    Jibiinkoka; 1962 Jun; 34():466-85. PubMed ID: 13879072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness.
    Niparko JK; Cox KM; Lustig LR
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 12544032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An investigation of the effects of occupational noise on hearing. In: Sensorineural hearing loss.
    Burns W; Robinson DW
    Ciba Found Symp; 1970; ():177-92. PubMed ID: 5210907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Occupational deafness: comparative study of routine audiometry and of simplified audiometric tests].
    VYNCKIER H; MASUREEL A
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1961; 15():570-3. PubMed ID: 13927001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microscopic prediction of speech intelligibility in spatially distributed speech-shaped noise for normal-hearing listeners.
    Geravanchizadeh M; Fallah A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):4004-15. PubMed ID: 26723354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Deafness is a scourge (and you can say that again).
    Anderson EG
    Geriatrics; 1998 Aug; 53(8):65-6, 69, 73. PubMed ID: 9713435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Resonance: a study of the outer ear].
    Menezes Pde L; Cabral A; Morais Lda S; Rocha LP; Passos V
    Pro Fono; 2004; 16(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 15609588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Understanding of speech in deafness due to noise].
    Schwetz F
    Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol; 1969; 103(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 5766863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Basic criteria for vegetative reaction and deafness conditioned by noise].
    Janssen G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1971; 25(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 5120986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices.
    Bosman AJ; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):419-24. PubMed ID: 27176657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measurement of sound.
    Randolph KJ
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1978 Oct; 11(3):597-610. PubMed ID: 733248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.