These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5746205)

  • 1. [Changes of the frequency discrimination threshold in presence of a continuous controlateral sound].
    Madonia T; Lentini G; Raso D
    Clin Otorinolaringoiatr; 1968; 20(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 5746205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Frequency discrimination].
    Giaccai F
    JFORL J Fr Otorhinolaryngol Audiophonol Chir Maxillofac; 1972 Mar; 21(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 4261695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A practical method for determination of the frequency discrimination threshold].
    Giaccai F; Cappellini F; Ricci T
    Boll Mal Orecch Gola Naso; 1970; 88(1):7-23. PubMed ID: 5515423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of small changes in frequency on clinically determined estimates of auditory threshold.
    Woodford CM
    ASHA; 1984 Apr; 26(4):25-30. PubMed ID: 6732892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hearing in the elephant (Elephas maximus): absolute sensitivity, frequency discrimination, and sound localization.
    Heffner RS; Heffner HE
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1982 Dec; 96(6):926-44. PubMed ID: 7153389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Behavior, in normal subjects, of frequency discriminative capacity in presence of masking].
    Salonna F; Quaranta A
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1971 Feb; 47(3):65-7. PubMed ID: 5088822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discrimination performance of high school sophomores on a battery of auditory tests.
    Elliott DN; Riach WD; Sheposh JP; Trahiotis C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1966; ():Suppl 216:1-59. PubMed ID: 5935910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ARTSTREAM: a neural network model of auditory scene analysis and source segregation.
    Grossberg S; Govindarajan KK; Wyse LL; Cohen MA
    Neural Netw; 2004 May; 17(4):511-36. PubMed ID: 15109681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporary changes in hearing after exposure to shooting noise.
    Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska M; Dudarewicz A; Bak M; Fiszer M; Kotyło P; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2004; 17(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 15387085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Auditory threshold drift for sinus signals and noise in normal hearing and in noise-damaged subjects].
    Fischer R; Gentz HD
    Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1971; 199(2):541-4. PubMed ID: 5153164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship between vocal pitch-matching skills and pitch discrimination skills in untrained accurate and inaccurate singers.
    Watts C; Moore R; McCaghren K
    J Voice; 2005 Dec; 19(4):534-43. PubMed ID: 16301100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The apparent pitch of short tones.
    Pollack I
    Am J Psychol; 1968 Jun; 81(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 5747960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [On a new test of frequency discrimination in a free field].
    Madonia T; Lentini G; Raso D
    Clin Otorinolaringoiatr; 1968; 20(4):296-305. PubMed ID: 5746208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancement, adaptation, and the binaural system.
    Serman M; Semal C; Demany L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4412-20. PubMed ID: 18537392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychophysics of 12 channels implant.
    Chouard CH; Fugain C; Drira M; Alcaras N
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():105-10. PubMed ID: 6596832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discrimination of envelope statistics reveals evidence of sub-clinical hearing damage in a noise-exposed population with 'normal' hearing thresholds.
    Stone MA; Moore BC; Greenish H
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Dec; 47(12):737-50. PubMed ID: 19085398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Word recognition performance in continuous and interrupted broad-band noise by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Stuart A; Phillips DP; Green WB
    Am J Otol; 1995 Sep; 16(5):658-63. PubMed ID: 8588673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical application of long-term intensity and pitch matches in fluctuating low-frequency hearing loss.
    Jonas Brannstrom K; Grenner J
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jul; 47(7):412-9. PubMed ID: 18574779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Low-frequency hearing of the worker exposed to noise].
    Schwetz F; Raber A
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1982 Aug; 61(8):452-61. PubMed ID: 7132506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.