These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5746208)

  • 1. [On a new test of frequency discrimination in a free field].
    Madonia T; Lentini G; Raso D
    Clin Otorinolaringoiatr; 1968; 20(4):296-305. PubMed ID: 5746208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Changes of the frequency discrimination threshold in presence of a continuous controlateral sound].
    Madonia T; Lentini G; Raso D
    Clin Otorinolaringoiatr; 1968; 20(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 5746205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The development of a screening test to distinguish occupational hearing loss (C5-dip).
    Kumashiro M
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1985 Sep; 14(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 3833925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pitch-discrimination at high frequencies by air- and bone-conduction.
    Corso JF; Levine M
    Am J Psychol; 1965 Dec; 78(4):557-66. PubMed ID: 5839923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A practical method for determination of the frequency discrimination threshold].
    Giaccai F; Cappellini F; Ricci T
    Boll Mal Orecch Gola Naso; 1970; 88(1):7-23. PubMed ID: 5515423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discrimination performance of high school sophomores on a battery of auditory tests.
    Elliott DN; Riach WD; Sheposh JP; Trahiotis C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1966; ():Suppl 216:1-59. PubMed ID: 5935910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Behavior, in normal subjects, of frequency discriminative capacity in presence of masking].
    Salonna F; Quaranta A
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1971 Feb; 47(3):65-7. PubMed ID: 5088822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term measurement of binaural intensity and pitch matches. II. Fluctuating low-frequency hearing loss.
    Brännström KJ; Grenner J
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Nov; 47(11):675-87. PubMed ID: 19031226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binaural pitch perception in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Santurette S; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):29-47. PubMed ID: 17107767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhancement, adaptation, and the binaural system.
    Serman M; Semal C; Demany L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4412-20. PubMed ID: 18537392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Free field frequency discrimination abilities of cochlear implant users.
    Pretorius LL; Hanekom JJ
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):77-84. PubMed ID: 18692556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency discrimination and literacy skills in children with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
    Halliday LF; Bishop DV
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1187-203. PubMed ID: 16411805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Considerations on the threshold of timbre discrimination in normal subjects].
    Madonia T; Lentini G
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1971; 92(3):105-13. PubMed ID: 5565274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Results of a new method for the measurement of the pitch and volume discrimination thresholds].
    SCHUBERT K
    Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1953; 163(2-6):437-49. PubMed ID: 13139574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neonatal frequency discrimination in 250-4000-Hz range: electrophysiological evidence.
    Novitski N; Huotilainen M; Tervaniemi M; Näätänen R; Fellman V
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):412-9. PubMed ID: 17134940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of ability to discriminate frequency of bone-conducted ultrasound by mismatch fields.
    Yamashita A; Nishimura T; Nakagawa S; Sakaguchi T; Hosoi H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jun; 438(2):260-2. PubMed ID: 18455304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DIPLACUSIS IN UNILATERAL HIGH-FREQUENCY HEARING LOSSES.
    GAETH JH; NORRIS TW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1965 Mar; 8():63-75. PubMed ID: 14311806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pitch perception in patients with a multi-channel cochlear implant using various pulses width.
    Aronson L; Rosenhouse J; Podoshin L; Rosenhouse G; Zanutto SB
    Med Prog Technol; 1994; 20(1-2):43-51. PubMed ID: 7968864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychophysics of 12 channels implant.
    Chouard CH; Fugain C; Drira M; Alcaras N
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():105-10. PubMed ID: 6596832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.