374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5754122)
1. [The colpocytological formula and index in hormonal cytodiagnosis. Results of 18 years of experience].
Moracci E
Minerva Ginecol; 1968 Feb; 20(4):327-38. PubMed ID: 5754122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Cytodiagnosis in gynecology].
Soost HJ
Med Klin; 1970 Nov; 65(48):2101-6. PubMed ID: 5494642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. ["Clearing treatment" of cytolysis and inflammation in the cytologic maturation degree smear].
Miklaw H
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1965 Jul; 87(31):1070-5. PubMed ID: 5891308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Cytopathology of nonneoplastic diseases in obstetrics and gynecology (author's transl)].
Namiki T; Kimura N; Hamanaka K; Kobayashi M; Endo S; Saeki M; Morizuka T; Watanabe M
Rinsho Byori; 1981 Jun; 29(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 7040744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [On some cases of apparent discrepancies between the colpocytological smear and endometrial biopsy in ovarian functional examination].
Scaglione V
Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1967 Feb; 89(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 5602706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Hormonal cytology: when and why.
Schneider V
Diagn Cytopathol; 1995 Aug; 13(2):163-5. PubMed ID: 8542799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Emergencies in gynecology and obstetrics].
Kümper HJ
Med Klin; 1981 Jun; 76(12):344-8. PubMed ID: 7278783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The activity of serum alkaline phosphatase in patients with endometrial carcinoma. I.
Laurová L; Jandová A; Skoda V
Neoplasma; 1971; 18(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 5568935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Actual and prospective prognostic value of suspicious cytological findings (Papanicolaou 3)].
Benz JJ; Glatthaar E
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1972 Mar; 32(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 5025945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Phase contrast microscopic study of vaginal exfoliative cytology. Technic and indications].
Bourg R
Brux Med; 1972 Mar; 52(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 4553945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [The practical physician and his attitude towards the problem of hormone therapy in gynecology].
Jäger G
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1967 Dec; 61(23):1193-8. PubMed ID: 5627209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Oncologic cytologic diagnosis correlated with the basal hormonal situation and with the presence of vaginal inflammation. Results of electro-mechanographic analysis, with a computer, of the findings of 9703 colpocytological examinations].
Rondinelli M; Minucci D; Ambrosini A
Attual Ostet Ginecol; 1968; 1():193-213. PubMed ID: 4916091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Hormonal cytodiagnosis with use of the phase contrast microscope].
GUGGISBERG W; HERRMANN U
Gynaecologia; 1957 Jul; 144(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 13448504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening for breast and gynaecological lesions.
Thomas BA
Lancet; 1970 Aug; 2(7669):409-12. PubMed ID: 4194704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Drug dependence in obstetrics and gynecology].
Meriggi E; Mansueto MG
Minerva Ginecol; 1980 Mar; 32(3):143-56. PubMed ID: 6990309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The activity of the social medical center for tumor prevention diagnosis and therapy. I. Cytology].
Guastalla L; Doria-Miglietta F
Pathologica; 1967; 59(877):325-8. PubMed ID: 5620177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Process of integration of obstetrical and gynecologic cytodiagnostics].
Stanek J; Walas-Skolicka E
Ginekol Pol; 1977 Sep; 48(9):819-27. PubMed ID: 562820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Cytodiagnosis in the early detection of cervico-uterine carcinoma during pregnancy and puerperal states].
Perez A; Araneda M; Leontic E; Martinez C; Escudero P
Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1970; 35(5):214-20. PubMed ID: 5523084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Gynecologic cytodiagnosis. Current state and possibilities for development].
Paulussen F; Hinckers HJ; Plotz EJ
Fortschr Med; 1978 Sep; 96(33):1673-8. PubMed ID: 700552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of the reliability of some indices of prognosis in threatened abortion].
Zenísek L; Mohapl M; Hadam I; Fingerová H; Lindner E; Sevela M
Cesk Gynekol; 1969 Apr; 34(4):234-7. PubMed ID: 5788569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]