These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Dynamic tonometry. I. The dynamic tonometer. Horven I Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1968; 46(6):1213-21. PubMed ID: 5756892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Theory of the Schiotz tonometer and its empirical calibration. Moses RA Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1971; 69():494-562. PubMed ID: 5154271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Anal tonometer for 2-channel registration of the supraampullar sensitivity of healthy and ill persons]. Viiachki I; Deleva Zh; Khristov D; Manolov G Khirurgiia (Sofiia); 1975; 28(6):590-2. PubMed ID: 1223499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [On the status of tonometer calibration in the Federal Republic of Germany]. Weigelin E; Jessen K Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1969 Aug; 155(2):263-70. PubMed ID: 5354462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Re-evaluation of the Schiotz tonometer calibration. Anderson DR; Grant WM Invest Ophthalmol; 1970 Jun; 9(6):430-46. PubMed ID: 5446047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [On the theory of method of tonometer calibration]. Jessen K Ber Zusammenkunft Dtsch Ophthalmol Ges; 1968; 68():340-4. PubMed ID: 5756792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [The importance of Moses' effect in regard to calibration of the tonometer]. Friedrich G; Jessen K Bibl Ophthalmol; 1968; 19(73):179-84. PubMed ID: 5634419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the Challenger digital applanation tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Lim JI; Ruderman JM Am J Ophthalmol; 1986 Aug; 102(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 3740173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical comparison of the ProTon and Tono-Pen tonometers with the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Midelfart A; Wigers A Br J Ophthalmol; 1994 Dec; 78(12):895-8. PubMed ID: 7819170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Suitability and calibration of a rebound tonometer to measure IOP in rabbit and pig eyes. Löbler M; Rehmer A; Guthoff R; Martin H; Sternberg K; Stachs O Vet Ophthalmol; 2011 Jan; 14(1):66-8. PubMed ID: 21199282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Control of the Zeiss tonometer]. Comberg D Bibl Ophthalmol; 1968; 19(73):192-6. PubMed ID: 5634421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of a self-tonometer to home tonometry. Zeimer RC; Wilensky JT; Gieser DK; Welch DB; Mori MT; Kahanic D Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Jan; 104(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 3942544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Halberg tonometer. An evaluation. François J; Vancea P; Vanderkerckhove R Arch Ophthalmol; 1971 Oct; 86(4):376-84. PubMed ID: 5110130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of the Cavitron Biotronics tonometer. Miller K; Sanborn GE; Jennings LW Arch Ophthalmol; 1988 Sep; 106(9):1210-3. PubMed ID: 3046584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of the non-contact tonometer and comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometer. Rao BS Indian J Ophthalmol; 1984; 32(5):432-4. PubMed ID: 6545335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A do-it-yourself fixation device for the ophthalmologist's office. Brubaker RF Arch Ophthalmol; 1976 Aug; 94(8):1400. PubMed ID: 949282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An evaluation of the GlaucoTest screening tonometer. Kaiden JS; Zimmerman TJ; Worthen DM Arch Ophthalmol; 1974 Sep; 92(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 4850540 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]