These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 576054)

  • 1. Olfactory testing: rules for odor identification.
    Cain WS; Krause RJ
    Neurol Res; 1979; 1(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 576054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of an International Odor Identification Test for Children: The Universal Sniff Test.
    Schriever VA; Agosin E; Altundag A; Avni H; Cao Van H; Cornejo C; de Los Santos G; Fishman G; Fragola C; Guarneros M; Gupta N; Hudson R; Kamel R; Knaapila A; Konstantinidis I; Landis BN; Larsson M; Lundström JN; Macchi A; Mariño-Sánchez F; Martinec Nováková L; Mori E; Mullol J; Nord M; Parma V; Philpott C; Propst EJ; Rawan A; Sandell M; Sorokowska A; Sorokowski P; Sparing-Paschke LM; Stetzler C; Valder C; Vodicka J; Hummel T
    J Pediatr; 2018 Jul; 198():265-272.e3. PubMed ID: 29730147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correspondence between three olfactory tests and suprathreshold odor intensity ratings.
    Koskinen S; Vento S; Malmberg H; Tuorila H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Nov; 124(9):1072-7. PubMed ID: 15513552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening of olfactory function with a four-minute odor identification test: reliability, normative data, and investigations in patients with olfactory loss.
    Hummel T; Konnerth CG; Rosenheim K; Kobal G
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2001 Oct; 110(10):976-81. PubMed ID: 11642433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Sniffin'Sticks: a new system for olfactory assessment in routine clinical practice].
    Wolfensberger M; Schnieper I
    HNO; 1999 Jul; 47(7):629-36. PubMed ID: 10463115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scratch density differentiates microsmic from normosmic and anosmic subjects on the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test.
    Doty RL; Genow A; Hummel T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Feb; 86(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 9530735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Clinical usefulness of odor stick identification test for patients with olfactory disturbance].
    Miwa T; Furukawa M; Tsukatani T; Ikeno S; Yata T; Horikawa I; Deguchi Y; Saito S
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2004 Oct; 107(10):956-65. PubMed ID: 15559299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Odor identification performance in children using the "U-Sniff" test - Administered by an untrained person.
    Gellrich J; Zscheile L; Zickmüller C; Schriever VA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Apr; 143():110664. PubMed ID: 33713929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds.
    Kobal G; Klimek L; Wolfensberger M; Gudziol H; Temmel A; Owen CM; Seeber H; Pauli E; Hummel T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 257(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 10867835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Self-ratings of olfactory function reflect odor annoyance rather than olfactory acuity.
    Knaapila A; Tuorila H; Kyvik KO; Wright MJ; Keskitalo K; Hansen J; Kaprio J; Perola M; Silventoinen K
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Dec; 118(12):2212-7. PubMed ID: 18948833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sniffin'Sticks: a new olfactory test battery.
    Wolfensberger M; Schnieper I; Welge-Lüssen A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Mar; 120(2):303-6. PubMed ID: 11603794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SMELL-S and SMELL-R: Olfactory tests not influenced by odor-specific insensitivity or prior olfactory experience.
    Hsieh JW; Keller A; Wong M; Jiang RS; Vosshall LB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Oct; 114(43):11275-11284. PubMed ID: 29073044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The candy smell test: a new test for retronasal olfactory performance.
    Renner B; Mueller CA; Dreier J; Faulhaber S; Rascher W; Kobal G
    Laryngoscope; 2009 Mar; 119(3):487-95. PubMed ID: 19235738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human responses to propionic acid. I. Quantification of within- and between-participant variation in perception by normosmics and anosmics.
    Kendal-Reed M; Walker JC; Morgan WT; LaMacchio M; Lutz RW
    Chem Senses; 1998 Feb; 23(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 9530972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Diagnostic methods in the assessment of anosmia in neurologic diseases].
    Kobal G; Stefan H
    Nervenarzt; 1995 Dec; 66(12):869-84. PubMed ID: 8584070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extended testing across, not within, tasks raises diagnostic accuracy of smell testing in Parkinson's disease.
    Boesveldt S; de Muinck Keizer RJ; Knol DL; Wolters ECh; Berendse HW
    Mov Disord; 2009 Jan; 24(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 18855928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of the Sniff Magnitude Test as a clinical test of olfactory function.
    Frank RA; Dulay MF; Gesteland RC
    Physiol Behav; 2003 Feb; 78(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 12576116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sumner's "On testing the sense of smell" revisited.
    Cain WS
    Yale J Biol Med; 1982; 55(5-6):515-9. PubMed ID: 7183023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensory reactions of nasal pungency and odor to volatile organic compounds: the alkylbenzenes.
    Cometto-Muñiz JE; Cain WS
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1994 Sep; 55(9):811-7. PubMed ID: 7942515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of olfaction.
    Cain WS; Gent J; Catalanotto FA; Goodspeed RB
    Am J Otolaryngol; 1983; 4(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 6625103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.