These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Operant procedures applied to stuttering therapy for children. Ryan BP J Speech Hear Disord; 1971 May; 36(2):264-80. PubMed ID: 5087665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Behavior therapy and stuttering: a review. Ingham RJ; Andrews G J Speech Hear Disord; 1973 Nov; 38(4):405-41. PubMed ID: 4585334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of response contingent reinforcement and response contingent punishment upon the frequency of stuttered verbal behavior. Moore WH; Ritterman SI Behav Res Ther; 1973 Feb; 11(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 4781957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of contingent events on stuttering and fluency. Lanyon RI; Barocas VS J Consult Clin Psychol; 1975 Dec; 43(6):786-93. PubMed ID: 1194475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment of stammering by reinforcement of fluent speech. Russell JC; Clark AW; Van Sommers P Behav Res Ther; 1968 Nov; 6(4):447-53. PubMed ID: 5714987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Verbal versus tangible reward for children who stutter. Manning WH; Trutna PA; Shaw CK J Speech Hear Disord; 1976 Feb; 41(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 1256042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of response-contingent reward on the connected speech of children who stutter. Shaw CK; Shrum WF J Speech Hear Disord; 1972 Feb; 37(1):75-88. PubMed ID: 5053947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Punishment of stuttering: contingency and stimulus parameters. James JE J Commun Disord; 1981 Sep; 14(5):375-86. PubMed ID: 7287913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Punishment of stuttering as a discriminative stimulus for reinforced fluency. Halvorson JA J Commun Disord; 1973 Dec; 6(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 4785185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The combined use of operant procedures and theoretical concepts in the treatment of an adult female stutterer. Egolf DB; Shames GH; Blind JJ J Speech Hear Disord; 1971 Aug; 36(3):414-21. PubMed ID: 5566121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Replacement of stuttering with normal speech. I. Rationale. Perkins WH J Speech Hear Disord; 1973 Aug; 38(3):283-94. PubMed ID: 4721787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Immediate versus delayed consequences of stuttering responses. Williams JD; Martin RB J Speech Hear Res; 1974 Dec; 17(4):569-75. PubMed ID: 4444279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Some operant conditioning techniques and their use in schools for the deaf. Osborne JG; Wageman RM Am Ann Deaf; 1969 Sep; 114(4):741-53. PubMed ID: 4900047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Token reinforcement systems. Andrews G Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1971 Sep; 5(3):134-6. PubMed ID: 5289339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An operant intervention for early stuttering. The development of the Lidcombe program. Onslow M; Menzies RG; Packman A Behav Modif; 2001 Jan; 25(1):116-39. PubMed ID: 11151481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Increasing fluency in young stutterers vs decreasing stuttering: a clinical approach. Bar A J Commun Disord; 1973 Dec; 6(4):247-58. PubMed ID: 4594240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. An experimental treatment with two preschool stuttering children. Martin RR; Kuhl P; Haroldson S J Speech Hear Res; 1972 Dec; 15(4):743-52. PubMed ID: 4652394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]