176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5770273)
1. Medical-legal guide--principles for cooperation. The Connecticut State Medical Society and The Connecticut Bar Association.
Conn Med; 1969 May; 33(5):326-8. PubMed ID: 5770273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Principles of cooperation in Medical-Legal Matters: a foreword. The Connecticut Bar Association and the Connecticut State Medical Association.
Walzer RS
Conn Med; 1998 Oct; 62(10):605-14. PubMed ID: 9821725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Interprofessional Code of Cooperation between the Tennessee Bar Association and the Tennessee Medical Association.
J Tenn Med Assoc; 1992 Apr; 85(4):195-200. PubMed ID: 1564936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Interprofessional code. Prepared jointly by the State Medical Society of Wisconsin and the State Bar of Wisconsin: 1990.
Wis Med J; 1990 Jul; 89(7):423-46. PubMed ID: 2375123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. New medical/legal interprofessional code for Louisiana undergoing development.[The Medical-Legal Interprofessional Committee. The Louisiana State Medical Society and The Louisiana Bar Association].
Marks HW
J La State Med Soc; 1993 Jun; 145(6):279-87. PubMed ID: 8340695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Use of private medical records in the testimony of the official medical officer].
Rieger HJ
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1973 Jan; 98(3):125. PubMed ID: 4684144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical records.
Conn Med; 1984 Apr; 48(4):261-2. PubMed ID: 11644127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The phantom expert: unconsented use of an expert's name and/or testimony, as a legal strategy.
Gutheil TG; Simon RI; Hilliard JT
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 11592459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Duty to submit medical records to courts, health insurance and impartial physicians].
Möllhoff G
Med Welt; 1968 Aug; 35():1876-81. PubMed ID: 5728955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comments of Connecticut State Medical Society concerning proposed practitioner fee schedule regulations before the Workers' Compensation Commission 23 September 1993.
Conn Med; 1993 Oct; 57(10):677-81. PubMed ID: 8275688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [On the requisition of medical records].
Kohlhaas M
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1968 Oct; 93(42):2027-9. PubMed ID: 5678871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. When researchers are served subpoenas: case study.
Holder AR
IRB; 1985; 7(4):5-7. PubMed ID: 11650704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Confidentiality of medical records: an overview for the Connecticut physician.
Blechner B; Mack D
Conn Med; 2000 Sep; 64(9):547-54. PubMed ID: 11055087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What to do if your supervisor orders a 'cover-up'.
Greenlaw J
RN; 1982 Oct; 45(10):81-2. PubMed ID: 11650657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Opinions and testimony of expert witnesses and independent medical evaluators.
Schofferman J
Pain Med; 2007; 8(4):376-82. PubMed ID: 17610460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient-psychotherapist privilege: access to clinical records in the tangled web of repressed memory litigation.
Loftus EF; Paddock JR; Guernsey TF
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1996 Jan; 30(1):109-54. PubMed ID: 11656851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [ON MEDICAL CERTIFICATES AND EXPERT TESTIMONY].
MUELLER F
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1964 Jan; 76():79-83. PubMed ID: 14123264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The importance of procedure.
Horty JF
Mod Healthc (Short Term Care); 1975 Nov; 4(5):71-2. PubMed ID: 241926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Nixon medical: legally, it's not 'confidential'.
Curran WJ
Med World News; 1975 Feb; 16(3):124. PubMed ID: 11661210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Expert evidence. General prerequisites and procedural characteristics for expert opinions].
Ulsenheimer K
Anaesthesist; 2005 Nov; 54(11):1081-8. PubMed ID: 16247639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
