These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5771101)

  • 1. Responses of cells in the superior olivary complex of the cat to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.
    Clark GM
    Exp Neurol; 1969 May; 24(1):124-36. PubMed ID: 5771101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of electric stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on single auditory-nerve fibers in the cat.
    Wiederhold ML; Kiang NY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1970 Oct; 48(4):950-65. PubMed ID: 5480390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variations in the effects of electric stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on cat single auditory-nerve-fiber responses to tone bursts.
    Wiederhold ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1970 Oct; 48(4):966-77. PubMed ID: 5480391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Studies of peripheral gating in the auditory system of cats.
    Irvine DR; Webster WR
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1972 May; 32(5):545-56. PubMed ID: 4112305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tetanus toxin blocks the efferent endings in the cochlea.
    Klinke R; Galley N; Pause M; Storch WH
    Brain Res; 1973 Jan; 49(2):447-50. PubMed ID: 4352732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Field potentials in the cat medial superior olivary nucleus.
    Clark GM; Dunlop CW
    Exp Neurol; 1968 Jan; 20(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 5637114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of auditory single fiber responses during acoustic and electric stimulation of the intact cat cochlea.
    Hartmann R; Topp G; Klinke R
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1982; 234(2):187-8. PubMed ID: 7092705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absence of a function for the crossed olivocochlear bundle under physiological conditions.
    Pfalz RK
    Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1969; 193(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 5355582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hearing of modulation in sounds.
    Kay RH
    Physiol Rev; 1982 Jul; 62(3):894-975. PubMed ID: 7045902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Olivocochlear neuronal responses in medulla of cat.
    Rupert AL; Moushegian G; Whitcomb MA
    Exp Neurol; 1968 Apr; 20(4):575-84. PubMed ID: 5659449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency dependence of cochlear microphonic augmentation produced by olivo-cochlear bundle stimulation.
    Kittrell BJ; Dalland JI
    Laryngoscope; 1969 Feb; 79(2):228-38. PubMed ID: 5765246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of electrical and acoustical stimulation of the cat ear.
    Simmons FB; Glattke TJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1972 Oct; 81(5):731-7. PubMed ID: 4651115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audition.
    Rabb DH
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1971; 22():95-118. PubMed ID: 4995344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. II. Effects of lesions.
    Achor LJ; Starr A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Feb; 48(2):174-90. PubMed ID: 6153333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrasting effects of centrifugal olivo-cochlear inhibition and of middle ear muscle contraction on the response characteristics of the cat's auditory nerve.
    Desmedt JE; La Grutta V; La Grutta G
    Brain Res; 1971 Jul; 30(2):375-84. PubMed ID: 5099176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence that gamma-aninobutyric acid is not the inhibitory transmitter at the crossed olivocochlear nerve-hair cell junction.
    Bobbin RP; Guth PS
    Neuropharmacology; 1970 Nov; 9(6):567-74. PubMed ID: 5497008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maturation of synapses and electrical properties of cells in the cochlear nuclei.
    Wu SH; Oertel D
    Hear Res; 1987; 30(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 3680058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of electrical stimulation of efferent olivocochlear neurons on cat auditory-nerve fibers. II. Spontaneous rate.
    Guinan JJ; Gifford ML
    Hear Res; 1988 May; 33(2):115-27. PubMed ID: 3397322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Far-field acoustic response: origins in the cat.
    Buchwald JS; Huang C
    Science; 1975 Aug; 189(4200):382-4. PubMed ID: 1145206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efferent inhibition of afferent acoustic activity in the unanesthetized rabbit.
    Borg E
    Exp Neurol; 1971 Jun; 31(3):301-12. PubMed ID: 5567455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.