207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5777166)
1. The United States Supreme Court and the chronic drunkenness offender.
Driver RJ
Q J Stud Alcohol; 1969 Mar; 30(1):165-72. PubMed ID: 5777166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The alcoholic offender--significance for determination of guilt. A legal view].
Maatz KR
Nervenarzt; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1389-401. PubMed ID: 15931539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Law and psychiatry.
Walsh JJ
Psychiatr Q Suppl; 1968; 42 Pt 1():22-39. PubMed ID: 5263964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The prevention of alcohol-related problems in the USA: health educators and the "new generation" of strategies.
Wallack L
Hygie; 1985 Jun; 4(2):23-30. PubMed ID: 4007867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The antialcoholism campaign in Poland.
ZieliĆski J
Q J Stud Alcohol; 1969 Mar; 30(1):173-7. PubMed ID: 5777167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Is the Supreme Court a kangaroo court? The other side of the coin.
Newell BL
J La State Med Soc; 1970 Feb; 122(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 5418159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Drunkenness as an offense in early New England. A study of "Puritan" attitudes.
Lender M
Q J Stud Alcohol; 1973 Jun; 34(2):353-66. PubMed ID: 4576716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Offenders, drunkeness and murder.
Scott PD
Br J Addict Alcohol Other Drugs; 1968 Dec; 63(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 5249828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A review of treatment and rehabilitation legislation regarding alcohol abusers and alcoholics in the United States: 1920-1971.
Hart L
Int J Addict; 1977 Aug; 12(5):667-78. PubMed ID: 200577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Forensic medical borderline questions in crimes during drunkenness].
Schewe G
Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1976; 34():45-57. PubMed ID: 971247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Criminal responsibility in drunkenness].
Egedi A
Psychiatr Hung; 2006; 21(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 16783030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Handling public drunkenness: reforms despite Powell.
Stern G
Int J Addict; 1970 Mar; 5(1):155-63. PubMed ID: 5524107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. What shall we do with the drunkenness offender?
Hershon HI; Cook T; Foldes PA
Br J Psychiatry; 1974 Apr; 124(0):327-35. PubMed ID: 4836154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion law in the United States: the untoward Christian reaction to recent Supreme Court decisions.
Crawford J
Law Justice; 1974 19-32, Hilary 42:; No():. PubMed ID: 11663577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comment on "The Uniform Alcoholism and Intoxication Treatment Act".
J Stud Alcohol; 1976 Jan; 37(1):100-44. PubMed ID: 55521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. U.S. abortion policy since Roe v. Wade.
Mcfarlane DR
Am J Gynecol Health; 1993; 7(4):98-106. PubMed ID: 12288251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Supreme Court unanimously okays use of RICO to combat antiabortion violence.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1994 Feb; (3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12287617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Supreme Court and Baby Jane Doe.
Drinan RF
America (NY); 1986 Mar; 154(9):180-2. PubMed ID: 11658666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Pregnant women's rights and the legal impact of theories of when life begins.
Crepps J; Miller A
Am J Ethics Med; 1994; 3(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 11652827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The residential rehabilitation center as an alternative to jail for chronic drunkenness offenders.
Coffler DB; Hadley RG
Q J Stud Alcohol; 1973 Dec; 34(4):1180-6. PubMed ID: 4767546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]