These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5779912)

  • 1. The effect of spatially separated sound sources on speech intelligibility.
    Dirks DD; Wilson RH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1969 Mar; 12(1):5-38. PubMed ID: 5779912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intelligibility characteristics of superior esophageal speech presented under various levels of masking noise.
    Horii Y; Weinberg B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Sep; 18(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 1186150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study.
    Koerner TK; Zhang Y; Nelson PB; Wang B; Zou H
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():58-67. PubMed ID: 28441570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification and discrimination of the relative onset time of two component tones: implications for voicing perception in stops.
    Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1977 May; 61(5):1352-61. PubMed ID: 881488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of compressor action on speech intelligibility.
    Caraway BJ; Carhart R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1967 Jun; 41(6):1424-33. PubMed ID: 6075556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech intelligibility differences across sound classes with in-the-ear and free-field microphones in quiet.
    Estis JM; Parisi JA; Moore RE; Brungart DS
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Jun; 112(3):845-59. PubMed ID: 21853774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phoneme discrimination in older persons under varying signal-to-noise conditions.
    Smith RA; Prather WF
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Sep; 14(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 5163897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influences of auditory object formation on phonemic restoration.
    Shinn-Cunningham BG; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):295-301. PubMed ID: 18177159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intelligibility of distorted speech sounds shifted in frequency and time in normal children.
    Nagafuchi M
    Audiology; 1976; 15(4):326-37. PubMed ID: 1275817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rationale and standardization for a combined speech articulation and auditory discrimination test.
    Hutchinson BB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Dec; 33(3):715-21. PubMed ID: 5127190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Delayed judgment speech-sound discrimination and /r/ or /s/ articulation status and improvement.
    Shelton RL; Johnson AF; Arndt WB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1977 Dec; 20(4):704-17. PubMed ID: 604684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reverberation time and maximum background-noise level for classrooms from a comparative study of speech intelligibility metrics.
    Bistafa SR; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Feb; 107(2):861-75. PubMed ID: 10687696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech intelligibility in a background noise and noise-induced hearing loss.
    Acton WI
    Ergonomics; 1970 Sep; 13(5):546-54. PubMed ID: 5490933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodological improvements in the assessment of phonological discrimination in children.
    Kamil ML; Rudegeair RE
    Child Dev; 1972 Sep; 43(3):1087-91. PubMed ID: 5056603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech sound discrimination by monkeys and humans.
    Sinnott JM; Beecher MD; Moody DB; Stebbins WC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1976 Sep; 60(3):687-95. PubMed ID: 824334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relative contribution of visual and auditory components of speech to speech intelligibility as a function of three conditions of frequency distortion.
    Sanders DA; Goodrich SJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Mar; 14(1):154-9. PubMed ID: 5550619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Further investigation of vowel items in multiple-choice speech discrimination testing.
    Owens E; Benedict M; Schubert ED
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Dec; 14(4):841-7. PubMed ID: 5163913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intelligibility of time-compressed CNC monosyllables.
    Beasley DS; Schwimmer S; Rintelmann WF
    J Speech Hear Res; 1972 Jun; 15(2):340-50. PubMed ID: 5065455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intelligibility of time-compressed speech: the effect of uniform versus non-uniform time-compression algorithms.
    Schlueter A; Lemke U; Kollmeier B; Holube I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1541-55. PubMed ID: 24606289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual categories for musiclike sounds: implications for theories of speech perception.
    Cutting JE; Rosner BS; Foard CF
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1976 Aug; 28(3):361-78. PubMed ID: 1005649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.