129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5783892)
1. Cellulolytic bacteria occurring in the rumen of sheep conditioned to low-protein teff hay.
Shane BS; Gouws L; Kistner A
J Gen Microbiol; 1969 Mar; 55(3):445-57. PubMed ID: 5783892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Extent of solubilization of alpha-cellulose and hemicellulose of low-protein teff hay by pure cultures of cellulolytic rumen bacteria.
Kock SG; Kistner A
J Gen Microbiol; 1969 Mar; 55(3):459-62. PubMed ID: 5783893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Characteristics of cellulolytic cillobacteria from the rumens of sheep fed teff (Eragrostis tef) hay diets.
van Gylswyk NO; Hoffman JP
J Gen Microbiol; 1970 Mar; 60(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 5487619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Characteristics of ruminococcus and cellulolytic butyrivibrio species from the rumens of sheep fed differently supplemented teff (Eragrostis tef) hay diets.
Van Gylswyk NO; Roché CE
J Gen Microbiol; 1970 Nov; 64(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 5516604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Stoichiometry of glucose and starch splitting by strains of amylolytic bacteria from the rumen and anaerobic digester.
Marounek M; Bartos S
J Appl Bacteriol; 1986 Jul; 61(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 3759723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rumen development in lambs. I. Microbial digestion of starch and cellulose.
Poe SE; Ely DG; Mitchell GE; Deweese WP; Glimp HA
J Anim Sci; 1971 Apr; 32(4):740-3. PubMed ID: 5571558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fusobacterium polysaccharolyticum sp.nov., a gram-negative rod from the rumen that produces butyrate and ferments cellulose and starch.
van Gylswyk NO
J Gen Microbiol; 1980 Jan; 116(1):157-63. PubMed ID: 7365452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CELLULOLYTIC COCCI OCCURRING IN THE RUMEN OF SHEEP CONDITIONED TO LUCERNE HAY.
KISTNER A; GOUWS L
J Gen Microbiol; 1964 Mar; 34():447-58. PubMed ID: 14135549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Relative efficiency of pure cultures of different species of cellulolytic rumen bacteria in solubilizing cellulose in vitro.
van Gylswyk NO; Labuschagne JP
J Gen Microbiol; 1971 Apr; 66(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 5105302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of two techniques for counting cellulolytic rumen bacteria.
van Gylswyk NO
J Gen Microbiol; 1970 Feb; 60(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 4922669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of strains of Eubacterium cellulosolvens from the rumen.
Prins RA; Van Vugt F; Hungate RE; Van Vorstenbosch CJ
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 1972; 38(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 4537442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of starch and protein degradation rates, hay sources, and feeding frequency on rumen microbial fermentation in a continuous culture system.
Chen CY; Hsu JT
Proc Natl Sci Counc Repub China B; 1998 Oct; 22(4):159-65. PubMed ID: 9850598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Eubacterium limosum, a ruminal hydrogenotrophic bacterium, on the degradation and fermentation of cellulose by 3 species of rumen anaerobic fungi.
Bernalier A; Fonty G; Bonnemoy F; Gouet P
Reprod Nutr Dev; 1993; 33(6):577-84. PubMed ID: 8142039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantification by real-time PCR of cellulolytic bacteria in the rumen of sheep after supplementation of a forage diet with readily fermentable carbohydrates: effect of a yeast additive.
Mosoni P; Chaucheyras-Durand F; Béra-Maillet C; Forano E
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Dec; 103(6):2676-85. PubMed ID: 18045448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fermentation of cellodextrins by cellulolytic and noncellulolytic rumen bacteria.
Russell JB
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1985 Mar; 49(3):572-6. PubMed ID: 3994365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Isolation and identification of rumen bacteria for cellulolytic enzyme production].
Aihemaiti M; Zhen F; Li Y; Aibaidoula G; Yimit W
Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2013 May; 53(5):470-7. PubMed ID: 23957151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of fermentation of diets of variable composition and microbial populations in the rumen of sheep and Rusitec fermenters. II. Protozoa population and diversity of bacterial communities.
Martínez ME; Ranilla MJ; Tejido ML; Saro C; Carro MD
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Aug; 93(8):3699-712. PubMed ID: 20655439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of replacing dietary starch with neutral detergent-soluble fibre on ruminal fermentation, microbial synthesis and populations of ruminal cellulolytic bacteria using the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC).
Zhao XH; Liu CJ; Liu Y; Li CY; Yao JH
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl); 2013 Dec; 97(6):1161-9. PubMed ID: 23278844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection and identification of rumen bacteria constituting a fibrolytic consortium dominated by Fibrobacter succinogenes.
Shinkai T; Ueki T; Kobayashi Y
Anim Sci J; 2010 Feb; 81(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 20163675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trends and innovations in rumen microbiology.
Hobson PN
Soc Appl Bacteriol Symp Ser; 1976; 4():125-40. PubMed ID: 5779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
