204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5785466)
1. [Experiences and results of cancer prevention examinations in an industrial out-patient clinic].
Wagner S
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1969 Feb; 63(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 5785466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The effect of various factors on participation in cytologic screening in the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer].
Kavungu P; Ebeling K; Ebert S
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1983; 77(21):883-5. PubMed ID: 6659584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Results of a computer assisted screening program for gynecologic mass examinations (author's transl)].
Seidenschnur G; Neumann HG; Büttner HH; Bader G; Beust M
Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1977; 47(4):298-303. PubMed ID: 921483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Early diagnosis of cervical cancer].
Ebeling K
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1987; 81(15):763-9. PubMed ID: 3687089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical cancer prevention.
Ross SH
Nurs Spectr (Wash D C); 1998 Mar; 8(6):12-4; quiz 14. PubMed ID: 10542650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Detection of cervical cancer at the Bell Telephone Company of Canada (1965-1969)].
Audet-Lapointe P
Union Med Can; 1972 Dec; 101(12):2713-6. PubMed ID: 4661704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Screening for cervical cancer in East Germany--a progress report].
Ebeling K; Nischan P
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1986; 80(7):278-305. PubMed ID: 3487887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Screening and diagnosis of cervical cancer].
Boulanger JC; Naepels P
Rev Prat; 2001 Sep; 51(13):1426-31. PubMed ID: 11601071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Controversy brews over cervical cancer screening.
Healthc Demand Dis Manag; 1998 Feb; 4(2):17-21. PubMed ID: 10178013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Cancer prevention in females working in the chemical industry. Report on cytological and colposcopy mass screenings of 5046 women].
Köhler L; Glück S; Klemm M; Reichardt HD
Z Gesamte Hyg; 1972 Nov; 18(11):793-7. PubMed ID: 4667245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Extend screening for cervical cancer! Improved diagnosis with papillomavirus test and colposcopy].
Rubinstein E
Lakartidningen; 1996 Jan; 93(5):365-6, 369. PubMed ID: 8628068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical screening result communication: a focus-group investigation of English women's experiences and needs.
Goldsmith MR; Austoker J; Marsh G; Kehoe ST; Bankhead CR
Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Oct; 17(5):334-8. PubMed ID: 18842971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Significance of systematic examinations of working women in the detection of uterine cervix cancer].
Mekuli S; Krajinović S; Udicki S; Bosković M; Nastasović M; Ducić S; Maric R; Obradović M; Sokić S; Radovanović Z
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1969 Jun; 97(6):631-9. PubMed ID: 5198723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Problem of uterine and ovarian cancer mass screening].
Ohmura M; Oda M
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2002 Nov; 29(11):1907-16. PubMed ID: 12465389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Suggestions for operational procedures in a cancer prevention center (espeically for gynecologic cancer screening)].
Philippson U
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1970 Dec; 64(24):1322-3. PubMed ID: 5520002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening for cervical cancer in Brazil.
Naud P; Busetti M; Becker E; Camozzato A; Siegler R; Cavagnoli J; Machado E; Bender Lima G; Timm AR
Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):391-4. PubMed ID: 9041751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical screening in HIV-positive women: characteristics of those who default and attitudes towards screening.
Shah S; Montgomery H; Smith C; Madge S; Walker P; Evans H; Johnson M; Sabin C
HIV Med; 2006 Jan; 7(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 16313292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Early diagnosis of cervical cancer].
Einhorn N
Lakartidningen; 1972 Aug; 69(35):3918-21. PubMed ID: 5057546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prevention of cervical cancer with screening programme in Branicevo District and cost-effectiveness analysis adjusted to the territory of the Republic of Serbia.
Perovic S
J BUON; 2009; 14(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 19373953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The role of colposcopy in evaluation of the cervix for unexpectedly positive pap smears].
Jesień-Sokołowska U; Madej JG
Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 10375918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
