These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5785631)

  • 1. Simultaneous performance in eyelid conditioning and probability learning as a function of puff intensity.
    Bernstein AL; Rutledge EF
    J Exp Psychol; 1969 Jan; 79(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 5785631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acquisition and extinction of human eyelid conditioned response as a function of schedule of reinforcement and unconditioned stimulus intensity under two masked conditioning procedures.
    Schurr BC; Runquist WN
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Dec; 101(2):398-401. PubMed ID: 4753867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance in eyelid conditioning following changes in reinforcement schedule.
    RUNQUIST WN
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Jun; 65():617-8. PubMed ID: 13975554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance in eyelid conditioning as a function of reinforcement schedules and changes in them.
    SPENCE KW; TRAPOLD MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1961 Nov; 47(11):1860-8. PubMed ID: 13915649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differential eyelid conditioning: establishing differential responding prior to varying the probability of reinforcement.
    Newman FL; Woodhouse J
    J Exp Psychol; 1969 Apr; 80(1):146-9. PubMed ID: 5787408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differential human eyelid conditioning as a function of the probability of reinforcement and CS similarity.
    Peterson GB; Newman FL
    J Exp Psychol; 1970 Aug; 85(2):318-20. PubMed ID: 5482031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differential classical eyelid conditioning as a function of CS intensity, CS rise time, and interstimulus interval.
    Wilcox SM; Ross LE
    J Exp Psychol; 1969 Nov; 82(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 5378046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. HUMAN-EYELID CONDITIONING: THE RECENT EXPERIMENTAL LITERATURE.
    ROSS LE; HARTMAN TF
    Genet Psychol Monogr; 1965 Feb; 71():177-220. PubMed ID: 14279692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Instructional sets in human differential eyelid conditioning.
    Prokasy WF; Allen CK
    J Exp Psychol; 1969 May; 80(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 5786447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of unconditioned stimulus intensity and schedules of 50 per cent partial reinforcement in human classical eyelid conditioning.
    Foth DL; Runquist WN
    J Exp Psychol; 1970 May; 84(2):244-7. PubMed ID: 5480924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Replicability of an optimal delay of reinforcement result in instrumental eyelid conditioning.
    Cerekwicki LE; Kantowitz BH; Grant DA
    J Exp Psychol; 1969 Jan; 79(1):189-90. PubMed ID: 5785629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of partial reinforcement on a classically conditioned eyeblink response in dogs.
    Vardaris RM; Fitzgerald RD
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1969 Apr; 67(4):531-4. PubMed ID: 5787405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance changes in eyelid conditioning as related to the motivational and reinforcing properties of the UCS.
    TRAPOLD MA; SPENCE KW
    J Exp Psychol; 1960 Apr; 59():209-13. PubMed ID: 13839194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response latency as a function of interstimulus interval in conditioned eyelid discrimination.
    Vandament WE
    J Exp Psychol; 1969 Dec; 82(3):561-5. PubMed ID: 5378233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-modal differentiation under identical reinforcement schedules, and UCS-intensity effects in human classical eyelid conditioning.
    Furedy JJ
    Can J Psychol; 1971 Feb; 25(1):7-23. PubMed ID: 5157750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relation of electric shock and anxiety to level of performance in eyelid conditioning.
    SPENCE KW; FARBER IE; TAYLOR E
    J Exp Psychol; 1954 Nov; 48(5):404-8. PubMed ID: 13221735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EYELID CONDITIONING AS A FUNCTION OF CS INTENSITY, UCS INTENSITY, AND MANIFEST ANXIETY SCALE SCORE.
    BECK SB
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Nov; 66():429-38. PubMed ID: 14081996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of CS-UCS interval and distance separating the CSS.
    Vandament WE
    Psychol Rep; 1969 Oct; 25(2):407-11. PubMed ID: 5367124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Kinetic and frequency-domain properties of reflex and conditioned eyelid responses in the rabbit.
    Gruart A; Schreurs BG; del Toro ED; Delgado-García JM
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Feb; 83(2):836-52. PubMed ID: 10669498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Partial reinforcement effects in classical aversive conditioning in rabbits and human beings.
    Leonard DW
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1975 Feb; 88(2):596-608. PubMed ID: 1150940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.