These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. An evaluation of an ultrasound unit for continuous monitoring of the fetal heart. Wingate MB; Tchilinguirian NG; Wingate L South Med J; 1971 Nov; 64(11):1342-5. PubMed ID: 5126797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The neonatal value of fetal monitoring. Hon EH; Zannini D; Quilligan EJ Trans Pac Coast Obstet Gynecol Soc; 1974; 42():115-26. PubMed ID: 1209701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the accuracy of a new ultrasonic fetal heart rate monitor. Lauersen NH; Hochberg HM; George ME Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Aug; 125(8):1125-35. PubMed ID: 952309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Instrumental monitoring of twin pregnancy and labor. Case reports]. Mandruzzato GP; Carlomagno G; Elia A; Gigli C; Macagno F; DeBonis F Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1973; 94(7-8):499-509. PubMed ID: 4804942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Continuous fetal monitoring in the ambulant patient. Torbet TE; Cooke MB Br Med J; 1976 Dec; 2(6048):1389. PubMed ID: 826301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical trial with alarm system labor monitors. Goodlin RC; Lowe EW; Douglass R Obstet Gynecol; 1974 Aug; 44(2):281-6. PubMed ID: 4421054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A new method of fetal heart rate monitoring. Leventhal JM; Brown WU; Weiss JB; Alper MH Obstet Gynecol; 1975 May; 45(5):494-500. PubMed ID: 1124164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal monitoring: is it worth it? Quilligan EJ; Paul RH Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Jan; 45(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 122861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Continuous microfilm display of the electromechanical intervals of the cardiac cycle. Hon EH; Murata Y; Zanini B; Martin CB; Lewis DE Obstet Gynecol; 1974 May; 43(5):722-8. PubMed ID: 4822658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fetal heart rate during late pregnancy. Wheeler T; Guerard P J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw; 1974 May; 81(5):348-56. PubMed ID: 4832317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Fetal monitoring during delivery and interpretation of its data. 2. Interpretation of the fetal heart rate. 1. The fetal heart rate baseline and its variability]. Murooka K Josanpu Zasshi; 1982 Feb; 36(2):5-8. PubMed ID: 6918464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of computers in the labor and delivery suite: an overview. Rosen MG; Sokol RJ; Chik L Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Nov; 132(6):589-94. PubMed ID: 717463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new disposable electrode model for clinical routine fhr monitoring. Junge HD J Perinat Med; 1973; 1(1):70-2. PubMed ID: 4806564 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Routine electronic monitoring of fetal heart rate and uterine activity during labor. Shenker L; Post RC; Seiler JS Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Aug; 46(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 1153149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]