These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5786373)

  • 1. Another approach to evaluating speech sound discrimination.
    Goldman R
    Except Child; 1969 May; 35(9):745-7. PubMed ID: 5786373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methodological improvements in the assessment of phonological discrimination in children.
    Kamil ML; Rudegeair RE
    Child Dev; 1972 Sep; 43(3):1087-91. PubMed ID: 5056603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech-sound discrimination and tactile-kinesthetic discrimination in reference to speech production.
    Madison CL; Fucci DJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Dec; 33(3):831-8. PubMed ID: 5127203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Another dimension for assessment of speech-sound discrimination: latency of response.
    Schwartz AH; Goldman R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Jun; 40(3):819-26. PubMed ID: 1178372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cardiac indices of infant speech perception: orienting and burst discrimination.
    Miller CL; Morse PA; Dorman MF
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1977 Aug; 29(3):533-45. PubMed ID: 905502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The discrimination of and orienting to speech and non-speech sounds in children with autism.
    Lepistö T; Kujala T; Vanhala R; Alku P; Huotilainen M; Näätänen R
    Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 1066(1-2):147-57. PubMed ID: 16325159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The psychophysics of categorical perception.
    Macmillan NA; Kaplan HL; Creelman CD
    Psychol Rev; 1977 Sep; 84(5):452-71. PubMed ID: 905471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the influence of the 'unity assumption' on the temporal perception of realistic audiovisual stimuli.
    Vatakis A; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 17258164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tone discrimination and speech perception benefit in Mandarin-speaking children fit with HiRes fidelity 120 sound processing.
    Chang YT; Yang HM; Lin YH; Liu SH; Wu JL
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 19704359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrimination performance of high school sophomores on a battery of auditory tests.
    Elliott DN; Riach WD; Sheposh JP; Trahiotis C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1966; ():Suppl 216:1-59. PubMed ID: 5935910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Change deafness and the organizational properties of sounds.
    Gregg MK; Samuel AG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):974-91. PubMed ID: 18665739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feature-testing models and their application to perception and memory for speech.
    Smith PT
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1973 Nov; 25(4):511-34. PubMed ID: 4767534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech versus tone processing in compensated dyslexia: discrimination and lateralization with a dichotic mismatch negativity (MMN) paradigm.
    Sebastian C; Yasin I
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Nov; 70(2):115-26. PubMed ID: 18801392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual recalibration and selective adaptation in auditory-visual speech perception: Contrasting build-up courses.
    Vroomen J; van Linden S; de Gelder B; Bertelson P
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):572-7. PubMed ID: 16530233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sound lateralization and speech discrimination in patients with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kubo T; Sakashita T; Kusuki M; Kyunai K; Ueno K; Hikawa C; Wada T; Shibata T; Nakai Y
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1998; 538():63-9. PubMed ID: 9879404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Categorical Perception of Speech (VOT) and Analogous Non-Speech (FOT) signals: Behavioral and electrophysiological correlates.
    Horev N; Most T; Pratt H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):111-28. PubMed ID: 17204903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning speech-in-noise discrimination in adult humans.
    Cainer KE; James C; Rajan R
    Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 238(1-2):155-64. PubMed ID: 18024026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relative contribution of visual and auditory components of speech to speech intelligibility as a function of three conditions of frequency distortion.
    Sanders DA; Goodrich SJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Mar; 14(1):154-9. PubMed ID: 5550619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oral stereognosis and auditory discrimination by adults, summary.
    Lewis FC; Kelly L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Jun; 38(3):1218. PubMed ID: 4417332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory neuroscience: sound segregation in the brainstem?
    Schnupp JW
    Curr Biol; 2008 Aug; 18(16):R705-6. PubMed ID: 18727905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.