These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5786450)

  • 1. Joint effects of stimulus intensity and preparatory interval on simple auditory reaction time.
    Botwinick J
    J Exp Psychol; 1969 May; 80(2):348-52. PubMed ID: 5786450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simple reaction time: effects associated with age, preparatory interval, incentive-shift, and mode of presentation.
    Elliott R
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1970 Feb; 9(1):86-107. PubMed ID: 5452110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of stimulus and task factors on Achilles tendon reflexes evoked early during a preparatory period.
    Scheirs JG; Brunia CH
    Physiol Behav; 1982 Apr; 28(4):681-5. PubMed ID: 6281829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age differences in reaction time as a function of experience, stimulus intensity, and preparatory interval.
    Botwinick J; Storandt M
    J Genet Psychol; 1973 Dec; 123(2d Half):209-17. PubMed ID: 4795235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensation and set in reaction time.
    Botwinick J; Storandt MA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Feb; 34(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 5011814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age differences in auditory reaction time of "brain-damaged" and normal children under regular and irregular preparatory interval conditions.
    Rourke BP; Czudner G
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1972 Dec; 14(3):372-8. PubMed ID: 4658481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of signal intensity on increase of reaction time on an auditory monitoring task.
    Lisper LO; Kjellberg A; Melin L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Apr; 34(2):439-44. PubMed ID: 5021789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Effects of spatial orientation on attention reaction time during pointing movement towards visual direction].
    Gueye L; Viallet F; Legallet E; Trouche E
    Dakar Med; 1998; 43(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 10797953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preparatory instructions in the differential conditioning of the galvanic skin response of schizophrenics and normals.
    Fuhrer MJ; Baer PE
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1970 Dec; 76(3):482-4. PubMed ID: 5490716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-modal reaction time and schizophrenic attentional deficit: a critical review.
    Mannuzza S
    Schizophr Bull; 1980; 6(4):654-75. PubMed ID: 6108610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simple reaction time in schizophrenic, retarded, and normal children under regular and irregular preparatory interval conditions.
    Czudner G; Marshall M
    Can J Psychol; 1967 Oct; 21(5):369-80. PubMed ID: 6065713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of item similarity on the speed of memory search.
    Wilcox L; Wilding JM
    Nature; 1970 Sep; 227(5263):1152-3. PubMed ID: 5451114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rhythm implicitly affects temporal orienting of attention across modalities.
    Bolger D; Trost W; Schön D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Feb; 142(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 23357092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audiovisual asynchrony modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1186():224-32. PubMed ID: 18005944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Musical expertise affects attention as reflected by auditory-evoked gamma-band activity in human EEG.
    Ott CG; Stier C; Herrmann CS; Jäncke L
    Neuroreport; 2013 Jun; 24(9):445-50. PubMed ID: 23660630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process?
    Monsell S; Mizon GA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):493-516. PubMed ID: 16822121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is visual dominance modulated by the threat value of visual and auditory stimuli?
    Van Damme S; Crombez G; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 193(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 18953530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rendering visual events as sounds: Spatial attention capture by auditory augmented reality.
    Stone SA; Tata MS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182635. PubMed ID: 28792518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.