These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5789240)
1. Stimulus control acquired by components of two color-form compound stimuli. Born DG; Peterson JL J Exp Anal Behav; 1969 May; 12(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 5789240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attention in the pigeon: testing for excitatory and inhibitory control by the weak elements. Kendall SB; Mills WA J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 May; 31(3):421-31. PubMed ID: 469465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reinforcement contingencies as discriminative stimuli: II. Effects of changes in stimulus probability. Lattal KA J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jan; 31(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 429958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transfer of matching performance in pigeons. Holmes PW J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jan; 31(1):103-14. PubMed ID: 429955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Separating the reinforcing and discriminative properties of brief-stimulus presentations in second-order schedules. Cohen SL; Calisto G; Lentz BE J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Sep; 32(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 501268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Learning of an oddity rule by pigeons in a four-choice touch-screen procedure. Aust U; Steurer MM Anim Cogn; 2013 May; 16(3):321-41. PubMed ID: 23111901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. INTEROCULAR TRANSFER OF DISCRIMINATIONS IN THE PIGEON. CATANIA AC J Exp Anal Behav; 1965 May; 8(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 14302746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attention, the presolution period, and choice accuracy in pigeons. Chase S; Schupak C; Ploog BO Behav Processes; 2012 Mar; 89(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 22138233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preferences among stimulus matches in the pigeon. Pisacreta R J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Sep; 38(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 6890092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Color preference in pigeons: stimulus intensity and reinforcement contingency effects in the avoidance of blue stimuli. Biederman GB; McDonald KG; Heighington GA; Vanayan M J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Mar; 49(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 3361267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A stimulus-location effect in contingency-governed, but not rule-based, discrimination learning. Meier C; Lea SE; McLaren IP J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 26866376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correspondence as conditional stimulus control: insights from experiments with pigeons. Lattal KA; Doepke KJ J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(2):127-44. PubMed ID: 11421307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the failure and facilitation of conditional discrimination. Williams BA J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Nov; 38(3):265-80. PubMed ID: 7175428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of barbiturates and other sedative hypnotics in pigeons trained to discriminate phencyclidine from saline. McMillan DE; Wenger GR J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Sep; 40(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 6631312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acquisition of stimulus control while introducing new stimuli in fading. Fields L J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jul; 32(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 490101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Independence of stimulus discriminability from absolute rate of reinforcement in a signal-detection procedure. McCarthy D; Davison M J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 May; 37(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 7097151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]