These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5789240)
21. The effects of amount of training per reversal on successive reversals of a color discrimination. Beale IL J Exp Anal Behav; 1970 Nov; 14(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 5491010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of stimulus orderability and reinforcement history on transitive responding in pigeons. Lazareva OF; Wasserman EA Behav Processes; 2006 May; 72(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 16460886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of proximity of elements on the feature-positive effect. Sainsbury RS J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Nov; 16(3):315-25. PubMed ID: 5150042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Signal functions in delayed discriminative stimulus control by reinforcement sources. Kuroda T; Lattal KA J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):355-72. PubMed ID: 24700527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Generalization and response mediation of a conditional discrimination. Eckerman DA J Exp Anal Behav; 1970 May; 13(3):301-16. PubMed ID: 5483825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pigeons (Columba livia) show change blindness in a color-change detection task. Herbranson WT; Jeffers JS Anim Cogn; 2017 Jul; 20(4):725-737. PubMed ID: 28429095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Conditional discrimination learning in the pigeon. Born DG; Snow ME; Herbert EW J Exp Anal Behav; 1969 Jan; 12(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 16811332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The influence of ultraviolet radiation on the pigeon's color discrimination. Wright AA J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 May; 17(3):325-37. PubMed ID: 5033890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of d-amphetamine on responding under second-order schedules of reinforcement with paired and nonpaired brief stimuli. Cohen SL J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Sep; 56(2):289-302. PubMed ID: 1955818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Summation in autoshaping is affected by the similarity of the visual stimuli to the stimulation they replace. Pearce JM; Redhead ES; George DN J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Apr; 28(2):175-89. PubMed ID: 11987874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Brightness contrast: a reinterpretation of compound cue and combined cue experiments with pigeons. Santiago HC; Wright AA J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Jan; 33(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 7365405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Method of stimulus combination impacts resistance to extinction. Podlesnik CA; Bai JY J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul; 104(1):30-47. PubMed ID: 25929758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of drugs on stimulus control of behavior. III. Analysis of effects of pentobarbital and d-amphetamine. Katz JL J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1988 Jul; 246(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 3392665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effects of chlorpromazine and imipramine on rate and stimulus control of matching to sample. Newland MC; Marr MJ J Exp Anal Behav; 1985 Jul; 44(1):49-68. PubMed ID: 4045376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Phencyclidine discrimination in the pigeon using color tracking under second-order schedule. McMillan DE; Cole-Fullenwider DA; Hardwick WC; Wenger GR J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Jan; 37(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 7057125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Conditioned reinforcement versus time to reinforcement in chain schedules. Williams BA; Royalty P J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 2341821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]