These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5792315)
1. Legal responsibilities of the university as a community. The present status of in loco parentis. Kimble WE J Am Coll Health Assoc; 1969 Feb; 17(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 5792315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The legal dynamics of the american campus. Schroeder O J Forensic Sci; 1971 Oct; 16(4):471-83. PubMed ID: 5139275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Patenting life. Kass LR Commentary; 1981 Dec; 72(6):45-57. PubMed ID: 11649383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Legal responsibilities of public health nurses. Northrop CE Nurs Outlook; 1985; 33(6):316. PubMed ID: 3851312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry. Protti M J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The America we seek: a statement of pro-life principle and concern. Agee MC; Argue D; Arkes H First Things; 1996 May; 63():40-4. PubMed ID: 11654353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethical and legal issues in patenting new animal life. Dresser R Jurimetrics; 1988; 28(4):399-435. PubMed ID: 11652544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns. Kobasic DM J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Why Roe v. Wade should be overruled. Loewy AH North Carol Law Rev; 1989 Apr; 67(4):939-48. PubMed ID: 11655982 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. AIDS--the legal implications. Means F Univ Ark Little Rock Law J; 1986-1987; 9(4):641-55. PubMed ID: 11651886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. University physician-researcher conflicts of interest: the inadequacy of current controls and proposed reform. Maatz CT High Technol Law J; 1992; 7():137-88. PubMed ID: 11659962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Judicial supremacy, right-to-life and the abortion decision. Lindholm LM Public Aff Q; 1988 Apr; 2(2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11651912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Human immunodeficiency virus, the legal meaning of "handicap," and implications for public education under federal law at the dawn of the age of the ADA. Buss WG Iowa Law Rev; 1992 May; 77(4):1389-508. PubMed ID: 11653373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Title X family planning subsidies: the government's role in moral issues. Reitler EG Harvard J Legis; 1990; 27(2):453-95. PubMed ID: 11656070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law. Sise CB San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Revisiting Roe v. Wade: substance and process in the abortion debate. Farrell MG Indiana Law J; 1993; 68(2):269-362. PubMed ID: 11656341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Japanese regulation of recombinant DNA activities. Henderson DF Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):891-901. PubMed ID: 11649590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Discretionary power: challenges to the use of student fees for abortion services. Gibbs A NACUBO Bus Off; 1991 Jan; 24(7):36-9. PubMed ID: 12343977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. AIDS discrimination under federal, state, and local law after Arline. Wasson RP Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1987; 15(2):221-78. PubMed ID: 11658972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]