These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Distribution pattern of cochlear combination tones. Sweetman RH; Dallos P J Acoust Soc Am; 1969 Jan; 45(1):58-71. PubMed ID: 5797148 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Dependence of the cochlear microphonics and the summating potential on the endocochlear potential. Honrubia V; Ward PH J Acoust Soc Am; 1969 Aug; 46(2):388-92. PubMed ID: 5804109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [The relationship between the electrical reaction of the cochlea to sonic and ultrasonic stimuli by air and bone conduction]. Sagalovich BM; Shipova LI Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1970 Aug; 56(8):1118-24. PubMed ID: 5508208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Species differences in cochlear fatigue related to acoustics of outer and middle ears of guinea pig and chinchilla. Drescher DG; Eldredge DH J Acoust Soc Am; 1974 Sep; 56(3):929-34. PubMed ID: 4421145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. On and off responses as measured in the cochlea of the guinea pig. Kupperman R J Acoust Soc Am; 1970 Feb; 47(2):518-24. PubMed ID: 5439651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Amplitude distributions of cochlear microphonic response to an acoustic sinusoid in noise. Teas DC; Henry GB J Speech Hear Res; 1968 Mar; 11(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 5648541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Properites of the summating potential of the guinea pig's cochlea. Honrubia V; Ward PH J Acoust Soc Am; 1969 Jun; 45(6):1443-50. PubMed ID: 5803167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comments on "Species differences in cochlear fatigue related to acoustics of outer and middle ears of guinea pig and chinchilla" (J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 56, 929-934 (1974)). Sinyor A; Laszlo CA J Acoust Soc Am; 1976 Feb; 59(2):472. PubMed ID: 1249335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigation of cochlear hair cells and the perception of ultrasound signals in guinea pigs. Wang FS; Nie G; Huang CC; Li Q; Li T; Zou Y; Zhang S; Ceng X Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2018 Aug; 64(11):44-49. PubMed ID: 30213288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Amplitude of microphone potentials of the guinea pig cochlea and function of the middle ear conductive apparatus]. Veselý C; Faltýnek L Sb Ved Pr Lek Fak Karlovy Univerzity Hradci Kralove; 1966; 9(3):319-26. PubMed ID: 5222610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [COMPARISON OF THE PHASE OF COCHLEAR MICROPHONIC RESPONSES OF BOTH EARS IN THE GUINEA PIG DURING AIR CONDUCTION AND DURING BONE CONDUCTION]. LEGOUIX JP C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1964; 158():1834-7. PubMed ID: 14270206 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The mechanism of excitation of the hair cells in the cochlea. Honrubia V; Strelioff D; Ward PH Laryngoscope; 1971 Oct; 81(10):1719-25. PubMed ID: 5114167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. High frequency bone conduction auditory evoked potentials in the guinea pig: Assessing cochlear injury after ossicular chain manipulation. Bergin MJ; Bird PA; Vlajkovic SM; Thorne PR Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):147-54. PubMed ID: 26493491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cochlear potentials in the study of cochlear physiology. Siegel JH Scand Audiol Suppl; 1986; 25():35-47. PubMed ID: 3554482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Auditory thresholds and cochlear microphonics from the same guinea pigs. Walloch RA; Taylor-Spikes M J Aud Res; 1977 Jul; 17(3):145-54. PubMed ID: 617343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Lumped-parameter model for in vivo cochlear stimulation. Suesserman MF; Spelman FA IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Mar; 40(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 8335327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]