BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 580079)

  • 1. Contact dermatitis in the West of Scotland.
    Husain SL
    Contact Dermatitis; 1977 Dec; 3(6):327-32. PubMed ID: 580079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Allergic contact dermatitis in children.
    Weston WL; Weston JA
    Am J Dis Child; 1984 Oct; 138(10):932-6. PubMed ID: 6383018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Epicutaneous testing with a standard series. Results in 12,026 patients].
    Enders F; Przybilla B; Ring J; Burg G; Braun-Falco O
    Hautarzt; 1988 Dec; 39(12):779-86. PubMed ID: 2976753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contact sensitization in patients with lower extremity dermatitis in the South Moravian region, Czech Republic.
    Necas M; Dastychová E
    Phlebology; 2010 Jun; 25(3):132-7. PubMed ID: 20483862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. First epidemiological study of contact dermatitis in Spain - 1977. Spanish Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
    Camarasa JM
    Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1979; 59(85):33-7. PubMed ID: 160734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Study on Chinese common allergens of contact dermatitis.
    Fan WX; Zhao B
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1990; 38(5):158-61. PubMed ID: 2286161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 24 and 48 h allergen exposure in patch testing. Comparative study with 11 common contact allergens and NiCl2.
    Kalimo K; Lammintausta K
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Jan; 10(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 6705516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contact allergy: predictive testing in man.
    Marzulli FN; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1976 Feb; 2(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 801606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standard patch test results in 3,225 consecutive Danish patient from 1973 to 1977.
    Hammershøy O
    Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Jun; 6(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 6447035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systemic contact dermatitis in children: how an avoidance diet can make a difference.
    Matiz C; Jacob SE
    Pediatr Dermatol; 2011; 28(4):368-74. PubMed ID: 20807367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical prediction of patch test results.
    Cronin E
    Trans St Johns Hosp Dermatol Soc; 1972; 58(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 4679255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contact allergy and sociodemographic characteristics.
    Marinović-Kulisić S; Lipozencić J; Pastar Z
    Coll Antropol; 2006 Jun; 30(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 16848139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evolution of contact dermatitis factors in a population. Epidemiology 1975-1981 ].
    Brun R
    Dermatologica; 1982 Jul; 165(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 7117648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patch testing in children from 2005 to 2012: results from the North American contact dermatitis group.
    Zug KA; Pham AK; Belsito DV; DeKoven JG; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Warshaw EM; Zirwas MJ
    Dermatitis; 2014; 25(6):345-55. PubMed ID: 25384228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Routine patch testing. II. Proposed basic series of test substances for Scandinavian countries and general remarks on testing technique.
    Magnusson B; Blohm SG; Fregert S; Hjorth N; Hovding G; Pirilä V; Skog E
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1966; 46(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 4162633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contact dermatitis of the hands: cross-sectional analyses of North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data, 1994-2004.
    Warshaw EM; Ahmed RL; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Toby Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Zug KA;
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Aug; 57(2):301-14. PubMed ID: 17553593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Allergic contact dermatitis and changes in the frequency of the causative allergens demonstrated with patch testing in 2008-2012.
    Tichy M; Karlova I
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2015 Sep; 159(3):480-8. PubMed ID: 24881589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Results of routine patch testing of 542 patients in Saskatoon, Canada.
    Hogan DJ; Hill M; Lane PR
    Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Aug; 19(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 3180777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Positive concomitant test reactions to allergens in the standard patch test series.
    Landeck L; González E; Baden L; Neumann K; Schalock P
    Int J Dermatol; 2010 May; 49(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 20534085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Standard epicutaneous testing: 5-year results and their effects on future examinations].
    Jarisch R; Sandor I
    Z Hautkr; 1978 Jul; 53(13):462-70. PubMed ID: 150143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.