These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5801020)

  • 1. The status of cytologic screening of the female population of greater new orleans in 1968.
    Holmquist ND; Cucchiara RF; Hackney WP
    J La State Med Soc; 1969 Aug; 121(8):256-9. PubMed ID: 5801020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The delayed diagnosis of invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Holmquist ND
    J La State Med Soc; 1990 Feb; 142(2):37-9. PubMed ID: 2307896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effective cytologic screening of the female population of greater New Orleans for cervical cancer.
    Holmquist ND
    J La State Med Soc; 1966 Jan; 118(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 5902061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The effect of various factors on participation in cytologic screening in the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer].
    Kavungu P; Ebeling K; Ebert S
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1983; 77(21):883-5. PubMed ID: 6659584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Vaginal smears in cytologic cancer screening].
    Takahashi M
    Rinsho Byori; 1965 Oct; 13(10):536-41. PubMed ID: 5894846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Participation in highly subsidized cervical cancer screening by women in Enugu, South-east Nigeria.
    Obi SN; Ozumba BC; Nwokocha AR; Waboso PA
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Apr; 27(3):305-7. PubMed ID: 17464818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Local mass cytologic screening for cancer of the cervix.
    Wallace D; Slankard JE
    Mo Med; 1972 Jun; 69(6):438-9 passim. PubMed ID: 5028742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mobilization for cervical cancer screening: lessons from a poor-urban Yoruba community in Nigeria.
    Thomas JO; Babarinsa IA; Ajayi IO; Fawole O; Ojemakinde KO; Omigbodun AO
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2005 Mar; 34(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 15973782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors underlying disparities in cervical cancer incidence, screening, and treatment in the United States.
    Akers AY; Newmann SJ; Smith JS
    Curr Probl Cancer; 2007; 31(3):157-81. PubMed ID: 17543946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Population screening and the irrigation smear.
    Ryan TJ; Vevers I
    Acta Cytol; 1967; 11(2):137-8. PubMed ID: 5230453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The cytologic detection of preclinical carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Soule EH
    Minn Med; 1968 Apr; 51(4):507-9. PubMed ID: 5689182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Population screening for cervical carcinoma in the Borough of Frederiksberg.
    Koch F; Stakemann G
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1967; 46():Suppl 9:77-84. PubMed ID: 6075717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The significance of endocervical cells in the diagnosis of cervical epithelial changes.
    Elias A; Linthorst G; Bekker B; Vooijs PG
    Acta Cytol; 1983; 27(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 6575534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Differences in cervical cancer mass screening results in Greater-Helsinki area].
    Nieminen P; Tarkkanen J; Timonen T; Meyer B; Hakama M; Anttila A
    Duodecim; 2000; 116(22):2489-96. PubMed ID: 12053343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality control in cytologic screening.
    Cecchini S; Grazzini G; Bonardi R; Ciatto S
    Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(3):436. PubMed ID: 8498145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Importance of atypical glandular cells of uncertain significance in cervical cytologic smears.
    Korn AP; Judson PL; Zaloudek CJ
    J Reprod Med; 1998 Sep; 43(9):774-8. PubMed ID: 9777615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Correlation between oncologically suspicious cytologic smears and colposcopic images of the uterine cervix and results of histopathologic examination taken from material provided by the Gynecology Department of the Pruszkow Municipal Hospital from 1995 to 1997].
    Czekanowski R; Pietrzak M; Kukulski P
    Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 10375926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of organized versus opportunistic cervical cytology screening in Hong Kong.
    Kim JJ; Leung GM; Woo PP; Goldie SJ
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Jun; 26(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 15284314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Management of abnormal cervical smears.
    Br Med J; 1980 May; 280(6226):1239-40. PubMed ID: 7388485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new self-administered test for uterine cancer: the Ayre scrape aspirator.
    Ayre JE
    Med Times; 1969 Jan; 97(1):151-61. PubMed ID: 5762726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.