These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5802904)

  • 1. [Problems in measuring fetl heart rate. Prelimenary report].
    Raimondi S; Bossart H
    Gynaecologia; 1969; 167(5):298-302. PubMed ID: 5802904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An intravaginal fetal ECG telemetry system.
    Neuman MR; Critchfield FH; Lin WC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1970 Jan; 35(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 5409841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Modern methods and the prospects for utilizing electronic apparatus in the obstetrical clinic].
    Persianinov LS; Filimonov VG; Khasin AZ
    Med Tekh; 1973; 4():5-8. PubMed ID: 4788666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A two-channel radiotelemetry system for clinical fetal monitoring.
    Neuman MR; O'Connor E
    Biotelem Patient Monit; 1980; 7(2):104-21. PubMed ID: 7417701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Continuous control of the fetal heart rate during labor and delivery by means of telemetric direct fetal electrocardiography].
    Baumgarten K; Fröhlich H; Seidl A; Sokol K
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1968 Apr; 80(16):307-10. PubMed ID: 5682173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical experience with telemetered heart rate monitoring.
    Parer JT; Imershein SL
    J Reprod Med; 1979 Dec; 23(6):305-6. PubMed ID: 522082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fetal heart rate monitoring using repeater telemetry methods.
    Weeks RW; Earl SA; Marshall WC; Dunn TG; Parker RO; Kaltenback CC
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1981; 17():125-8. PubMed ID: 7284528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of auditory versus electronic assessment of antenatal fetal welfare.
    O'Leary JA; Mendenhall HW; Andrinopoulos GC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 56(2):244-6. PubMed ID: 7393517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fetal cardiography by telemetry--the benefits of technology brought to the home.
    Middlemiss C
    Midwives Chron; 1987 Jul; 100(1194):190-1. PubMed ID: 3649556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A new method for determination of fetal cardiac rhythm and of the force of contractions with a closed system by means of electronic logic].
    Mariotti F
    Atti Soc Ital Cardiol; 1968; 2():234-40. PubMed ID: 5752677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Telemetry].
    Suda H
    Sanfujinka No Jissai; 1966 Jan; 15(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 6012869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Telemetric transmission of fetal cardiac rhythm in monitoring high risk pregnancies (author's transl)].
    Crépin G; Querleu D; Meurette J; Laloux V
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1981; 10(8):797-806. PubMed ID: 7338600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Prolonged fetal monitoring, ultrasonic telemetric registering. Methodology. Applications].
    Puech F; Cnudde M; Le Coutour X; Leroy JL; Delecour M
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1983; 12(5):505-9. PubMed ID: 6655211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Obstetrical monitoring devices and interpretation of the data. 3. Interpretation of the fetal heart rate. 2. Fetal heart rate: transient deceleration].
    Murooka K
    Josanpu Zasshi; 1982 Mar; 36(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 6918467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Cardiotochography].
    Kornacki Z; Czajkowski Z; Szczygielski A
    Ginekol Pol; 1971 Apr; 42(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 4931191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Electro-acoustic problems of fetal phonocardiography].
    Kunzfeld J; Stehlíková J
    Cesk Gynekol; 1971 Feb; 36(1):46-7. PubMed ID: 5550023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [On the effect of labor pain activity on the maternal and fetal heart action. Also a contribution to the telemetric control during labor].
    Baumgarten K; Sokol K; Fröhlich H
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1966 Dec; 116(51):1131-4. PubMed ID: 5973409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a new ultrasonic fetal heart motion detector.
    Hochberg HM; Saltzman MB
    Curr Ther Res Clin Exp; 1971 Dec; 13(12):729-33. PubMed ID: 5001740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Daily relationships between fetal and maternal heart rates at 38 to 40 weeks of pregnancy.
    Patrick J; Campbell K; Carmichael L; Natale R; Richardson B
    Can Med Assoc J; 1981 May; 124(9):1177-8. PubMed ID: 7237339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Selection device for the separate registration of fetal and maternal heart rate from abdominal electrocardiograms].
    Fischer WM; Helmke K
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1972 Aug; 176(4):343-6. PubMed ID: 5080623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.