These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Mechanical tuning and amplification within the apex of the guinea pig cochlea. Recio-Spinoso A; Oghalai JS J Physiol; 2017 Jul; 595(13):4549-4561. PubMed ID: 28382742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of electrical stimulation of the olivo cochlear bundle at the cochlear level. Buño W; García-Ausit E Acta Neurol Latinoam; 1970; 16(1):125-38. PubMed ID: 5538050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cochlear masking and adaptation. Kupperman R Acta Otolaryngol; 1971; 71(2):232-41. PubMed ID: 5577020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Relationship of distortion product in cochlea with cochlear activity revealed by laser interferometry]. Long X; Zhang Y; Lu J; Long C Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Sep; 29(18):1644-7. PubMed ID: 26790268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement of the cochlear potentials of the guinea pig at constant sound-pressure level at the eardrum. I. Cochlear-microphonic amplitude and phase. Laszlo CA; Gannon RP; Milsum JH J Acoust Soc Am; 1970 Apr; 47(4):1063-70. PubMed ID: 5443153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Frequency tuning of mechanical responses in the mammalian cochlea. Robles L; Alcayaga C Biol Res; 1996; 29(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 9278704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combined effect of sound and oxygen deprivation upon cochlear microphonics in guinea pigs. TONNDORF J; HYDE RW; BROGAN FA Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1955 Jun; 64(2):392-405. PubMed ID: 14388560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of an electrode for the artificial cochlear sensory epithelium. Tona Y; Inaoka T; Ito J; Kawano S; Nakagawa T Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):106-12. PubMed ID: 26299844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Effects of operative changes in the sound-conducting apparatus on inner ear of guinea pig; detection of hearing power by measurement of cochlear potentials]. WAGEMANN W Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1953; 164(2):165-89. PubMed ID: 13139595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Amplitude distributions of cochlear microphonic response to an acoustic sinusoid in noise. Teas DC; Henry GB J Speech Hear Res; 1968 Mar; 11(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 5648541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2. Siegel JH; Kim DO; Molnar CE J Neurophysiol; 1982 Feb; 47(2):303-28. PubMed ID: 7062102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Longitudinal distribution of the cochlear microphonics inside the cochlear duct (guinea pig). Honrubia V; Ward PH J Acoust Soc Am; 1968 Oct; 44(4):951-8. PubMed ID: 5683661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Some effects of tonal interactions as seen in the cochlear microphonic. Nieder P; Nieder I J Acoust Soc Am; 1968 May; 43(5):1092-106. PubMed ID: 5648100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Travel time in the cochlea and its determination from cochlear-microphonic data. Dallos P; Cheatham MA J Acoust Soc Am; 1971 Apr; 49(4):Suppl 2:1140+. PubMed ID: 5552191 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Technic of the entire cochleogram for the study of the cochlea in guinea pigs]. Crifò S; Sidoli A Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1975 Dec; 51(23):1850-3. PubMed ID: 1241840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]