These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5804110)

  • 1. Remote masking for listeners with cochlear impairment.
    Keith RW; Anderson CV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1969 Aug; 46(2):393-8. PubMed ID: 5804110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal integration in normal hearing, cochlear impairment, and impairment simulated by masking.
    Florentine M; Fastl H; Buus S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):195-203. PubMed ID: 3411048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson DA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Dec; 34(6):1233-49. PubMed ID: 1787705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spectrotemporal analysis and cochlear hearing impairment: effects of frequency selectivity, temporal resolution, signal frequency, and rate of modulation.
    Hall JW; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2550-62. PubMed ID: 2745879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization and simulation of impaired hearing: implications for hearing aid design.
    Moore BC
    Ear Hear; 1991 Dec; 12(6 Suppl):154S-161S. PubMed ID: 1794642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Release from masking as a means of studying hair cell function.
    Carterette EC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1969 Sep; 12(3):497-509. PubMed ID: 5811847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of cochlear impairment and equivalent-threshold masking on psychoacoustic tuning curves.
    Florentine M
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):241-53. PubMed ID: 1449429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tone decay and SISI scores.
    Bartholomeus B; Swisher L
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1971 May; 93(5):451-5. PubMed ID: 5554880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Osseous masking and MLD].
    Quaranta A; Cervellera G
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1972 May; 48(10):266-7. PubMed ID: 5070666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Plastic changes along auditory pathway during salicylate-induced ototoxicity: Hyperactivity and CF shifts.
    Jiang C; Luo B; Manohar S; Chen GD; Salvi R
    Hear Res; 2017 Apr; 347():28-40. PubMed ID: 27989950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear and brainstem evoked potentials: quantitative determination of hearing impairment in children.
    Scherg M
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1979 Mar; 11():135-44. PubMed ID: 299180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of gaps in sinusoids and pulse trains by patients with cochlear implants.
    Shannon RV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2587-92. PubMed ID: 2745882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochlear hearing loss and the processing of modulation: effects of temporal asynchrony.
    Grose JH; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jul; 100(1):519-27. PubMed ID: 8675845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of consonant recognition in quiet for listeners with normal and impaired hearing using an auditory model.
    Jürgens T; Ewert SD; Kollmeier B; Brand T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1506-17. PubMed ID: 24606286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mid-bandwidth loudness depression in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Hots J; Jarzombek K; Verhey JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2334. PubMed ID: 27250129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of hearing impairment and presentation level on masking period patterns for Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes.
    Summers V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Nov; 108(5 Pt 1):2307-17. PubMed ID: 11108371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
    Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intensity perception. XIV. Intensity discrimination in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Florentine M; Reed CM; Rabinowitz WM; Braida LD; Durlach NI; Buus S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2575-86. PubMed ID: 8270735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterizing auditory processing and perception in individual listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Jepsen ML; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):262-81. PubMed ID: 21303008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increased intensity discrimination thresholds in tinnitus subjects with a normal audiogram.
    Epp B; Hots J; Verhey JL; Schaette R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):EL196-201. PubMed ID: 22979832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.